Affiliation:
1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, Guangdong, PR China
2. Institute of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University & Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 510440, Guangdong, PR China
3. Department of Microbiology, Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 510440, Guangdong, PR China
4. Department of Blood Transfusion, General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA, Guangzhou 510010, Guangdong, PR China
5. Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The 2nd Clinical Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, PR China
Abstract
Introduction. The oral cavity is one of the largest reservoirs of microorganisms and many pathogenic bacteria have been shown to be associated with the aetiology of oral cancers.
Gap Statement. Owing to the complexity of oral microbial communities and their unclear relationship with oral cancer, identification of specific bacteria which contribute to oral cancer is a key imperative.
Aim. To compare and investigate the variations in the composition of the bacterial microbiome and its functions between patients with oral tumorous lesions and healthy subjects.
Methodology. Twenty-seven samples from individuals with oral tumours (five oral benign tumours and 22 oral squamous cell carcinomas) and 15 samples from healthy subjects were collected. Genomic DNA was extracted and the V3–V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced. Subsequently, bioinformatic assessment was conducted using QIIME2, PICRUSt and linear discriminant analysis effect size analyses (LEfSe).
Results. The oral microbiota was composed mainly of the phyla
Proteobacteria
(31.76 %, 35.00 %),
Bacteroidetes
(30.13 %, 25.13 %) and
Firmicutes
(23.92 %, 17.07 %) in tumorous and healthy individuals, respectively.
Neisseria
,
Prevotella
,
Fusobacterium
,
Streptococcus
,
Capnocytophaga
,
Veillonella
,
Haemophilus
,
Prevotella
,
Porphyromonas
and
Leptotrichia
were the most abundant genera. Alpha diversity in the tumour group was significantly greater than that in the healthy group (P<0.05). Differential analysis of microbes between groups demonstrated a significantly higher number of
Neisseria
,
Veillonella
,
Streptococcus
,
Leptotrichia
,
Lautropia
,
Sphingopyxis
,
Sphingobium
,
Tannerella
,
Actinomyces
and
Rothia
in healthy controls compared with the tumour group. However, the genera
Treponema
,
Micrococcus
,
Pseudomonas
,
Janthinobacterium
, Parvimos,
Loktanella
,
Staphylococcus
,
Acinetobacter
,
Catonella
,
Aggregatibacter
and
Propionibacterium
were significantly higher in the tumour group. Pathways related to cancers, cell motility, environmental adaptation, metabolism and signal transduction were enhanced in the tumour group, while functions associated with immune system diseases, replication, repair and translation were significantly enhanced in the healthy group.
Conclusion. Variations in the oral microbiota and its functions showed a correlation with oral tumours. The tumour group showed an increased abundance of some multi-drug-resistant and periodontitis-related pathogens. The significantly altered microbiotas may serve as potential biomarkers or inform combination therapy for oral tumours.
Subject
Microbiology (medical),General Medicine,Microbiology