Comparative in vitro activities of omadacycline, eravacycline and tigecycline against non-ESBL-producing, ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant isolates of K. pneumoniae

Author:

Mirza Hasan Cenk1ORCID,Güçlü Aylin Üsküdar1ORCID,İnce Ceviz Gizem1ORCID,Başustaoğlu Ahmet1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Microbiology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

Abstract

Introduction. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae are characterized by the World Health Organization as pathogens for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. Omadacycline and eravacycline are two novel antibacterials within the tetracycline class. Gap Statement. There are limited data regarding the comparison of the activities of omadacycline, eravacycline and tigecycline against K. pneumoniae isolates with different antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. Aim. Our objective was to compare the in vitro activities of omadacycline, eravacycline and tigecycline against a collection of K. pneumoniae isolates, including non-ESBL-producing, ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant strains. Methodology. Ninety-four K. pneumoniae isolates, including 30 non-ESBL-producing, 30 ESBL-producing and 34 carbapenem-resistant (22 carrying bla OXA-48, 12 carrying bla NDM) strains were included in the study. ESBL and carbapenemase genes were detected by conventional PCR. Omadacycline, eravacycline and tigecycline MICs were determined by the gradient diffusion method and interpreted using US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-defined breakpoints. Results. Overall, the percentage of tigecycline-susceptible strains (97.9 %) was higher than the percentage of omadacyline-susceptible (75.5 %) and eravacycline-susceptible (72.3 %) strains. The omadacycline and eravacycline susceptibility rates were 83.3 % among non-ESBL-producing isolates and 66.7 % among ESBL-producing isolates. The most common ESBL gene detected was blaCTX -M (90 %), followed by bla TEM (50 %) and bla SHV (50 %). The omadacycline and eravacycline susceptibility rate among isolates carrying bla TEM was 33.3 %, whereas it was 100 % among isolates that do not carry bla TEM. The omadacycline and eravacycline susceptibility rates among carbapenem-resistant isolates were 76.5 and 67.6 %, respectively. The omadacycline susceptibility rates among bla OXA-48-positive and bla NDM-positive isolates were 77.3 and 75.0 %, respectively. The eravacycline susceptibility rates among bla OXA-48-positive and bla NDM-positive isolates were 68.2 and 66.7 %, respectively. One carbapenem-resistant isolate was intermediate and one ESBL-producing isolate was resistant to tigecycline. Conclusion. Overall, tigecycline was the most active tetracycline against isolates. Omadacycline and eravacycline showed excellent activity against ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates that do not carry bla TEM. Omadacycline showed reasonable activity against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates carrying bla OXA-48 or bla NDM.

Publisher

Microbiology Society

Subject

Microbiology (medical),General Medicine,Microbiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3