Acceptable performance of the Abbott ID NOW among symptomatic individuals with confirmed COVID-19

Author:

Stokes William123ORCID,Berenger Byron M.41ORCID,Singh Takshveer5ORCID,Adeghe Ifueko3,Schneider Angela5ORCID,Portnoy Danielle6ORCID,King Teagan5ORCID,Scott Brittney6ORCID,Pabbaraju Kanti1ORCID,Shokoples Sandy1ORCID,Wong Anita A.1,Gill Kara1ORCID,Turnbull LeeAnn1,Hu Jia78,Tipples Graham193ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Public Health Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Alberta, Canada

2. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

3. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada

4. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

5. Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

6. Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

7. Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada

8. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

9. Li Ka Shing Institute of Virology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Abstract

Introduction. The ID NOW is FDA approved for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic individuals within the first 7 days of symptom onset for COVID-19 if tested within 1 h of specimen collection. Gap statement. Clinical data on the performance of the ID NOW are limited, with many studies varying in their study design and/or having small sample size. Aim. In this study we aimed to determine the clinical performance of the ID NOW compared to conventional RT-PCR testing. Methodology. Adults with COVID-19 in the community or hospital were recruited into the study. Paired throat swabs were collected, with one throat swab transported immediately in an empty sterile tube to the laboratory for ID NOW testing, and the other transported in universal transport media and tested by an in-house SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay targeting the E gene. Results. In total, 133 individuals were included in the study; 129 samples were positive on either the ID NOW and/or RT-PCR. Assuming any positive result on either assay represents a true positive, positive per cent agreement (PPA) of the ID NOW compared to RT-PCR with 95 % confidence intervals was 89.1 % (82.0–94.1%) and 91.6 % (85.1–95.9%), respectively. When analysing individuals with symptom duration ≤7 days and who had the ID NOW performed within 1 h (n=62), ID NOW PPA increased to 98.2 %. Conclusion. Results from the ID NOW were reliable, especially when adhering to the manufacturer’s recommendations for testing.

Publisher

Microbiology Society

Subject

Microbiology (medical),General Medicine,Microbiology

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3