Comparison of various antimicrobial agents as catheter lock solutions: preference for ethanol in eradication of coagulase-negative staphylococcal biofilms

Author:

Qu Yue1,Istivan Taghrid S.1,Daley Andrew J.2,Rouch Duncan A.1,Deighton Margaret A.1

Affiliation:

1. School of Applied Sciences, RMIT University, Plenty Road, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia

2. Department of Microbiology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia

Abstract

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are the main causative agents of bacteraemia in infants managed in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Intraluminal colonization of long-term central venous catheters by these bacteria and subsequent biofilm formation are the prerequisites of the bloodstream infections acquired in NICUs. The catheter lock technique has been used to treat catheter colonization; however, the optimum choice of antimicrobial agents and their corresponding concentrations and exposure times have not been determined. The effectiveness of catheter lock solutions (CLSs) was assessed by determining the minimal biofilm eradication concentration of antimicrobial agents against CoNS biofilms. Five conventional antibiotics (oxacillin, gentamicin, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin and rifampicin) alone or in combination, as well as ethanol, were evaluated. Ethanol was found to be superior to all of these conventional antibiotics when used as a CLS. A time–kill study and confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed that exposure to 40 % ethanol for 1 h was sufficient to kill CoNS biofilm cells. To our knowledge, this is the first in vitro study to provide solid evidence to support the rationale of using ethanol at low concentrations for a short time as a CLS, instead of using conventional antibiotics at high concentrations for a long period to treat catheter-related bloodstream infections.

Publisher

Microbiology Society

Subject

Microbiology (medical),General Medicine,Microbiology

Cited by 69 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3