Appreciating the Theoretical Perspectives of the Rwandan Genocide: Implications for Conflict Resolution Practice

Author:

Obeng-Baah JosephORCID,Odoom DanielORCID,Agyepong LawrenciaORCID

Abstract

The  repercussions  of  conflicts  and  wars  on  human  life  and  national  progress  are  inestimably  high.  Indeed,  the  incalculably ravaging  consequences  of  conflicts  and  wars  suggest  that  countries  need  to institute  measures  aimed  at  promoting  peace  and peaceful  coexistence  among  their  citizens.  However,  to  achieve  this,  one  must  have  a  full  understanding  of  the  various  causal elements and triggers of conflicts and wars. Where there is a lack of clear understanding of the push and pull factors of conflicts and  wars  and  their  socio-political,  socio-cultural,  and  psychological  undertones,  stakeholders  find  it  extremely  difficult  to institute measures to promote peace and unity. The Rwandan genocide, arguably, provides a rather tragic reminder of the sorry state  of  affairs  countries  have  to  endure  as  a  result  of  conflicts.  The irreparable damage caused by the Rwandan genocide continues to attract huge attention among academics. To this end, various papers and studies have been done to help bring clarity to  the  issues  surrounding  the  genocide,  with  findings  gleaned  from  multi-dimensional  perspectives.  This paper attempts to contribute to enhancing understanding of the Rwandan genocide from a theoretical perspective using a desk review approach. In this  review  paper,  issues  that  are germane  to the genocide  are  examined from  a  theoretical perspective  in  order  to  appreciate the implications they present for conflict resolution practice. Finally, the paper states, among others, that media institutional renewal is crucial to preventing future violent conflicts given the incendiary role the media played in the genocide.

Publisher

AJER Publishing

Subject

General Medicine

Reference78 articles.

1. Azar, E. (1990). The management of protracted social conflict: Theory and cases. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.

2. Black, P. W. (2008). Identities. In Conflict, ed. Sandra Cheldelin, Daniel Druckman, and Larissa Fast, 147-166. New York and London: Continuum.

3. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and methods. Englewood-Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

4. Cheldelin, S, Warfield, W., & Makamba, J. (2004). Research frontiers in conflict analysis and resolution. In Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution: 64-78.

5. Cheldelin, S. I. (2006). Gender and violence: Redefining the moral ground. In Identity, morality, and threat: Studies in violent conflict, ed. Daniel Rothbart and Karina V. Korostelina, 279-299. Lanham: Lexington Books.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3