“She should support me, she's my doctor:” Patient perceptions of agency in contraceptive decision‐making in the clinical encounter in Northern California

Author:

Rao Lavanya1,Rocca Corinne H.12,Muñoz Isabel12,Chambers Brittany D.3,Devaskar Sangita4,Asiodu Ifeyinwa V.5,Stern Lisa6,Blum Maya1,Comfort Alison B.1,Harper Cynthia C.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine San Francisco California USA

2. Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine San Francisco California USA

3. Department of Human Ecology University of California, Davis, School of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Davis California USA

4. Planned Parenthood Northern California Santa Rosa California USA

5. Department of Family Health Care Nursing, School of Nursing University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California USA

6. Coalition to Expand Contraceptive Access (CECA) San Francisco California USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionAgency in contraceptive decision‐making is an essential aspect of reproductive autonomy. We conducted qualitative research to investigate what agency means to patients seeking contraceptive care to inform the development of a validated measure of this construct.MethodologyWe held four focus group discussions and seven interviews with sexually‐active individuals assigned female at birth, ages 16–29 years, recruited from reproductive health clinics in Northern California. We explored experiences in contraceptive decision‐making during the clinic visit. We coded data in ATLAS.ti and by hand, compared codes across three coders, and used thematic analysis to identify salient themes.ResultsThe sample mean age was 21 years, with 17% of participants identifying as Asian, 23% as Black, 27% as Latinx, 17% as Multiracial/other, and 27% as white. Overall, participants reported active and engaged decision‐making in their recent contraceptive visit but noted experiences that had undermined their agency in the past. They described how non‐judgmental care allowed them to communicate openly, affirming their ability to make their own decisions. However, several mentioned how unexpected contraceptive side effects after the visit had reduced their sense of agency over their decision in retrospect. Several participants, including those who identified as Black, Latinx, and/or Asian, described prior experiences where pressure to use a contraceptive method had undermined their agency and where they had switched providers to regain agency over their contraceptive decisions.DiscussionMost participants were aware of their agency during contraceptive visits and how it varied in different experiences with providers and the healthcare system. Patient perspectives can help to inform measurement development and ultimately the delivery of care that supports contraceptive agency.

Funder

Society of Family Planning

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Publisher

Guttmacher Institute

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Sociology and Political Science

Reference47 articles.

1. Contraceptive Autonomy: Conceptions and Measurement of a Novel Family Planning Indicator

2. MalcolmN SternL HartJ.Definitions and measures of reproductive and sexual health‐related constructs: agency autonomy empowerment equity quality of life and wellbeing: CECA coalition to expand contraceptive accesss.2021.

3. WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT AND FAMILY PLANNING: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

4. Women's empowerment and fertility: A review of the literature

5. Development and Validation of the Sexual and Reproductive Empowerment Scale for Adolescents and Young Adults

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3