Development of a clinical questionnaire to support contraception decisions in an adolescent reproductive health clinic in Colorado

Author:

Hoopes Andrea J.1,Akers Aletha Y.2,Jimenez‐Zambrano Andrea3,Cain Sarah4,Maslowsky Julie5,Sheeder Jeanelle6

Affiliation:

1. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute Seattle Washington USA

2. Department of Pediatrics Guttmacher Institute New York New York USA

3. Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA

4. Department of Emergency Medicine Los Angeles County‐University of Southern California Emergency Medicine Residency Los Angeles California USA

5. Department of Community Health Sciences, Center of Excellence in Maternal and Child Health University of Illinois‐Chicago, School of Public Health Chicago Illinois USA

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Pediatrics University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA

Abstract

AbstractContextAdolescents need support to make informed decisions about contraception. Few clinical questionnaires exist to help adolescents and their healthcare providers align contraception decisions with patient needs and preferences.MethodsOur mixed‐methods study involved a convenience sample of English‐speaking, female patients aged 13–19 seeking contraception services at an adolescent reproductive health clinic in Colorado, USA. Qualitative interviews informed development of clinical questionnaire items. The questionnaire elicited demographic characteristics, pregnancy and contraception use history, preferred contraception attributes, peer and family involvement, healthcare information and support needs, motivations for contraceptive use, and barriers to contraceptive services. We identified key decision‐making factors and reduced the number of questionnaire items through principal components analysis. Using multivariable analyses, we examined the correlation between questionnaire responses and current contraceptive method.ResultsTwenty individuals participated in interviews and 373 individuals completed the preliminary questionnaire with 63 candidate items. We identified five contraceptive decision‐making factors: side‐effect avoidance (eight items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.84), preferred method attributes (six items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.67), parental involvement (three items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.67), life goals prior to parenting (four items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.88), and access to a contraceptive provider (two items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and nine stand‐alone items. In multivariable analyses, we found that questionnaire responses for decision‐making factors varied among participants using different contraceptive methods.ConclusionsMultiple priorities may influence adolescent contraceptive decisions. This clinical questionnaire can elicit these priorities before or during a healthcare encounter. Future studies should assess generalizability of the questionnaire and examine impact on method choice, continuation, satisfaction, and reproductive health outcomes.

Publisher

Guttmacher Institute

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Sociology and Political Science

Reference34 articles.

1. What is behind the declines in teen pregnancy rates?;Boonstra HD;Guttmacher Policy Rev,2014

2. Vital signs: Trends in use of long‐acting reversible contraception among teens aged 15–19 years seeking contraceptive services: United States, 2005–2013;Romero L;MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,2015

3. Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception

4. Racial and ethnic differences in women's preferences for features of contraceptive methods

5. The role of contraceptive attributes in women’s contraceptive decision making

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reproductive Justice as an Alternative to the Pregnancy Planning Paradigm for Teens;Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing;2024-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3