Affiliation:
1. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute Seattle Washington USA
2. Department of Pediatrics Guttmacher Institute New York New York USA
3. Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA
4. Department of Emergency Medicine Los Angeles County‐University of Southern California Emergency Medicine Residency Los Angeles California USA
5. Department of Community Health Sciences, Center of Excellence in Maternal and Child Health University of Illinois‐Chicago, School of Public Health Chicago Illinois USA
6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Pediatrics University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA
Abstract
AbstractContextAdolescents need support to make informed decisions about contraception. Few clinical questionnaires exist to help adolescents and their healthcare providers align contraception decisions with patient needs and preferences.MethodsOur mixed‐methods study involved a convenience sample of English‐speaking, female patients aged 13–19 seeking contraception services at an adolescent reproductive health clinic in Colorado, USA. Qualitative interviews informed development of clinical questionnaire items. The questionnaire elicited demographic characteristics, pregnancy and contraception use history, preferred contraception attributes, peer and family involvement, healthcare information and support needs, motivations for contraceptive use, and barriers to contraceptive services. We identified key decision‐making factors and reduced the number of questionnaire items through principal components analysis. Using multivariable analyses, we examined the correlation between questionnaire responses and current contraceptive method.ResultsTwenty individuals participated in interviews and 373 individuals completed the preliminary questionnaire with 63 candidate items. We identified five contraceptive decision‐making factors: side‐effect avoidance (eight items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.84), preferred method attributes (six items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.67), parental involvement (three items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.67), life goals prior to parenting (four items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.88), and access to a contraceptive provider (two items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and nine stand‐alone items. In multivariable analyses, we found that questionnaire responses for decision‐making factors varied among participants using different contraceptive methods.ConclusionsMultiple priorities may influence adolescent contraceptive decisions. This clinical questionnaire can elicit these priorities before or during a healthcare encounter. Future studies should assess generalizability of the questionnaire and examine impact on method choice, continuation, satisfaction, and reproductive health outcomes.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Sociology and Political Science
Reference34 articles.
1. What is behind the declines in teen pregnancy rates?;Boonstra HD;Guttmacher Policy Rev,2014
2. Vital signs: Trends in use of long‐acting reversible contraception among teens aged 15–19 years seeking contraceptive services: United States, 2005–2013;Romero L;MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,2015
3. Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
4. Racial and ethnic differences in women's preferences for features of contraceptive methods
5. The role of contraceptive attributes in women’s contraceptive decision making
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献