Glucose Differences Between Continuous Glucose Monitor Brands and Application Sites

Author:

Pham Kevin C.12,Liu Xiaohan2,Shek Allen2,Shah Sachin A.12

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Investigation Facility, David Grant USAF Medical Center, Fairfield, CA, USA

2. University of the Pacific, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy, Stockton, CA, USA

Abstract

Switching between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device brands and application sites is common in clinical practice. We hypothesized that the differences between CGM device measurements are significant enough to impact glycemic control interpretation. Current evidence has identified a trend of clinically meaningful differences between right- and left-arm CGM readings in one CGM device. We also hypothesized that application sites can affect glycemic control interpretation. A case study in which two adult males each wore three Dexcom G6 (right arm, left arm, abdomen) and two FreeStyle Libre Pro (right arm, left arm) CGM devices simultaneously for 10 days was conducted to explore performance differences between CGM devices and application sites. Our case report was consistent with both hypotheses as clinically meaningful differences were observed between time-matched, same-arm Dexcom G6 versus FreeStyle Libre Pro glucose readings and between time-matched FreeStyle Libre Pro right-arm versus left-arm glucose readings. Glycemic control was not significantly impacted by the three Dexcom G6 application sites.

Publisher

IntechOpen

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3