An Examination of Peer-to-Peer Scaffolding as Metacognitive Support for Learning

Author:

Wen Wen,Castek Jill

Abstract

This descriptive study examines peer-to-peer scaffolding implemented in an undergraduate, online digital literacies course for future educators. It identifies the different features of students collaboration processes and how these processes function as peer scaffolding to support their learning. Analyses of students’ collaborative dialog and reflections on their collaboration processes. By analyzing dialog, this study examines how collaborative discussion that is high quality can act as a form of peer-to-peer scaffolding that encourages metacognition. Peer-to-peer scaffolding not only provides just-in-time support, but also triggers students’ regulation thus helping them to refine their understanding and enhance self-awareness of their learning processes. Findings suggest that productive collaboration can serve as a useful means of peer-to-peer scaffolding marked by five specific features: 1) complementing each other’s expertise, 2) co-constructing knowledge, 3) collaborating to problem-solve, 4) encouraging reciprocal support, and 5) triggering regulation. Findings further explore students’ perspectives on collaboration. Students felt they benefited from peer-to-peer collaboration when the collaboration yielded the development of new ideas and understanding, offered support for problem solving, and provided opportunities for self-reflection. These markers of quality collaboration assisted students in achieving their learning goals. Recommendations outlined in this chapter offer guidance for educators by describing ways to promote productive collaboration when designing and implementing instruction.

Publisher

IntechOpen

Reference42 articles.

1. Hsieh YC. A case study of the dynamics of scaffolding among ESL learners and online resources in collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2017;30(1-2):115-132

2. Scardamalia M, Bereiter C. Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In: Sawyer RK, editor. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2014. pp. 397-417

3. Choi I, Land SM, Turgeon AJ. Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional Science. 2005;33:483-511

4. Forman EA, Cazden CB. Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In: Wertsch JV, editor. Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1985. pp. 323-347

5. Webb NM, Palincsar AS. Group processes in the classroom. In: Berliner DC, Cafree RC, editors. Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan; 1996. pp. 841, 841-873, 873

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3