Perspective Chapter: New Approaches to the Assessment of Domain-Specific Creativity

Author:

Topal Altindiş Zehra

Abstract

Science and technology getting continue to advance, the true wealth of our civilization will manifest in human creative output. Accordingly, technological developments offer great opportunities for creativity researches and assessment of creativity. While there are studies in the literature on the creation of computer-based creative products on the one hand, studies on whether creativity can be evaluated automatically or not, on the other hand, have started to attract attention. In addition, field experts turned to new research to understand whether creativity assessment could be automated and measured more quickly and qualitatively, and to explore whether this calculation method could be standardized. Researches conducted in the last 10 years have shown that computational approaches towards semantic distance have made significant contributions to the field both in theory and in practice. However, it can be said that there are very few studies that measure creativity based on semantic distance. This chapter presents a brief overview to discuss whether a computer-based measurement tool that can perform automatic calculations can be used in the evaluation of linguistic creativity in light of the evidence obtained from the literature.

Publisher

IntechOpen

Reference98 articles.

1. Sternberg RJ. Wisdom, Intelligence and Creativity Synthesized. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. 246 p

2. Treffinger DJ. Creativity, Creative Thinking, and Critical Thinking: In Search of Definitions. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning; 1996

3. Treffinger DJ, Young GC, Selby EC, Shepardson C. Assessing Creativity: A Guide for Educators. Sarasota, Florida: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, Center for Creative Learning; 2002

4. Plucker JA, Makel MC. Assessment of creativity. In: Kaufman JC, Sternberg RJ, editors. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2010. pp. 48-73

5. Simpson Frances K, Lokugamage Amali U. The elephant and the blind men: The children of long Covid. BMJ. 2021;372. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n157

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3