Abstract
Science and technology getting continue to advance, the true wealth of our civilization will manifest in human creative output. Accordingly, technological developments offer great opportunities for creativity researches and assessment of creativity. While there are studies in the literature on the creation of computer-based creative products on the one hand, studies on whether creativity can be evaluated automatically or not, on the other hand, have started to attract attention. In addition, field experts turned to new research to understand whether creativity assessment could be automated and measured more quickly and qualitatively, and to explore whether this calculation method could be standardized. Researches conducted in the last 10 years have shown that computational approaches towards semantic distance have made significant contributions to the field both in theory and in practice. However, it can be said that there are very few studies that measure creativity based on semantic distance. This chapter presents a brief overview to discuss whether a computer-based measurement tool that can perform automatic calculations can be used in the evaluation of linguistic creativity in light of the evidence obtained from the literature.
Reference98 articles.
1. Sternberg RJ. Wisdom, Intelligence and Creativity Synthesized. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. 246 p
2. Treffinger DJ. Creativity, Creative Thinking, and Critical Thinking: In Search of Definitions. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning; 1996
3. Treffinger DJ, Young GC, Selby EC, Shepardson C. Assessing Creativity: A Guide for Educators. Sarasota, Florida: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, Center for Creative Learning; 2002
4. Plucker JA, Makel MC. Assessment of creativity. In: Kaufman JC, Sternberg RJ, editors. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2010. pp. 48-73
5. Simpson Frances K, Lokugamage Amali U. The elephant and the blind men: The children of long Covid. BMJ. 2021;372. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n157