Perspective Chapter: Approaches to Quality Assurance and Technological Innovation in Higher Education Institutions

Author:

A. Al-Imarah Ahmed

Abstract

Literature from the wider field of management research is ambiguous with respect to the relationship between quality management and innovation, with some arguing that quality management supports innovation while others claim it is a hindrance. This chapter focuses on the relationship between QA and innovation in higher education, specifically the development of massive-open-online-courses (MOOCs). Analysis of interviews and documents shows that QA does not support innovation; universities focus on the quality of conventional in-person courses, but less on new innovation like MOOCs. The particular characteristics of MOOCs (e.g., diverse learners and light content) make the application of existing QA procedures difficult. Also, analysis shows that the most relevant quality approach for MOOCs is a combination of the conventional approach to QA in higher education and a new QA approach that takes into consideration the characteristics and features of MOOCs. The findings of the study provide suitable empirical evidence to support a cogent argument about the capabilities and qualifications of MOOCs in higher education with regard to QA, further defining the role of MOOCs in higher education.

Publisher

IntechOpen

Reference55 articles.

1. Martin M, Stella A. External Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Making Choices. Paris: UNESCO/International Institute for Educational Planning; 2007

2. Martensson K, Roxa T, Stensaker B. From quality assurance to quality practices: An investigation of strong microcultures in teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education. 2014;39(4):534-545

3. Massaro V. Cui bono? The relevance and impact of quality assurance. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2010;32(1):17-26

4. Creelman A, Ehlers U, Ossiannilsson E. Perspectives on MOOC quality: An account of the EFQUEL MOOC Quality Project, INNOQUAL. International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning. 2014;2(3):78-87

5. García-Fernandez M, Claver-Cortes E, Tarí JJ. Relationships between quality management, innovation and performance: A literature systematic review. European Research on Management and Business Economics. 2022;28(1):1-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3