Subjective Well-Being at the Workplace as a Social Action: Opportunities for Management and Self-Management

Author:

Zakharova Lyudmila,Saralieva Zaretkhan,Leonova Irina

Abstract

Theoretical model of system determination of subjective well-being at work at the levels of society culture, organizational culture, personality, and psychophysiological level is presented. Subjective well-being at work is considered as a necessary condition for adult working man to experience happiness. The results of research of subjective well-being of personnel of Russian companies (N=425) are presented. It is shown that subjective well-being can be considered as a social action of interactive nature. The key role of organizational culture was revealed. The following indicators of subjective well-being are considered: conformity of individual values of organizational development with the vector of organizational culture, the level of organizational stress, self-assessment of fatigue and health. The role of subjective well-being in the conditions of organizational changes as an emotional regulator of personnel’s acceptance of innovations is shown. The effects of subjective well-being include personal involvement in work activities, age-related self-esteem, and personal activity in working with information. The analysis of characteristics of modern economy, which allow employees of companies to acquire meanings of acceptance of innovations in corporate training, is given. The managerial practices contributing to the construction of a culture of resilience are shown.

Publisher

IntechOpen

Reference65 articles.

1. Myers DG. The Pursuit of Happiness: Discovering the Pathway to Fulfillment, Well-Being, and Enduring Personal Joy. New York: Avon Books; 1992. p. 336

2. Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL. Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin. 1999;125(2):276-302. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276

3. Tasic J, Amir S, Tan J, Khader M. A multilevel framework to enhance organizational resilience. Journal of Risk Research. 2020;23(6):713-738. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2019.1617340

4. Sutcliffe KM, Vogus TJ. Organizing Resilience. In: Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE, editors. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundation of a New Discipline. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2003. pp. 94-110

5. McAslan A. Organizational Resilience. Understanding the Concept and its Application. Torrens Resilience Institute; 2010. Available from: https://www.flinders.edu.au/content/dam/documents/research/torrens-resilience-institute/organisational-resilience.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3