Author:
Liliav Benjamin,Torres-Strauss Luis
Abstract
Breast reconstructive options have evolved over the past six decades. Despite advancements in technology, improved therapeutic options, and genetic testing, women are still, unfortunately, faced with a myriad of deformities after treatments for breast cancer. In order to restore an esthetically pleasing breast mound, a careful evaluation of the patient must be taken into account. There are, generally, three components or factors that need to be considered while devising an excellent reconstructive option for a particular patient. These are: patient factors, surgeons’ factors, and oncologic factors. It is only with a detailed understanding of each one of these factors that a sound solution is arrived at. In this chapter, we will explore the various modalities of breast reconstruction available to patients. We will also demonstrate specific considerations in order to optimize an excellent outcome for our breast cancer patients.
Reference52 articles.
1. American Cancer Society, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. The Facts and Figures 2022
2. World Health Organization. Breast Cancer Fact Sheets. 2021
3. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, Margolese R, Wolmark N, Wickerman L, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1989;320:822-828. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198903303201302
4. Veronesi U, Salvadori B, Luini A, Banfi A, Del Vecchio M, Saccozzi R, et al. Conservative treatment of early breast cáncer. Long-term resuls of 1232 cases treated with qudrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy. Annals of Surgery. 1990;211:250-259
5. Lichter AS, Lippman ME, Danforth DN, et al. Mastectomy versus brest-conserving therapy in the treatment of stage I and II carcinoma of the breast: A randomized trial at the National Cancer Institute. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1992;10:976-983. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.6.976