Abstract
In this chapter, a set of analytical aerodynamic models, based on potential flow, that can be used to predict the unsteady lift response during pitching maneuvers are presented and assessed. The result examines the unsteady lift coefficients experienced by a flat plate in high-amplitude pitch ramp motion. The pitch ramps are chosen based on two ramp pitch maneuvers of a maximum amplitudes of 25 and 45 degrees starting from zero degree. The aim is investigate the use of such classical models in predicting the lift dynamics compared to a full physical-based model. Among all classical methods used, the unsteady vortex lattice method (without considering the leading edge vortex) is found to be a very good predictor of the motion lift dynamic response for the 25 ° ramp angle case. However, at high pitch maneuvers (i.e.,the 45 ° ramp angle case), could preserve the response pattern with attenuated amplitudes without high computational burden. These mathematical analytical models presented in this chapter can be used to obtain a fast estimate for aircraft unsteady lift during pitch maneuvers instead of high fidelity models, especially in the early design phases.
Reference44 articles.
1. Cory, R. and Tedrake, R. (2008). “Experiments in fixed-wing uav perching." Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA Reston, VA, 1–12
2. Hoburg, W. and Tedrake, R. (2009). “System identification of post stall aerodynamics for uav perching." Proceedings of the AIAA Infotech@ Aerospace Conference, 1–9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swallow,
3. Katz, J. and MASKEW, R. (1988). “Unsteady low-speed aerodynamic model for complete aircraft configurations." Journal of Aircraft, 25(4), 302–310
4. Schlichting, H. T. and Truckenbrodt, E. A. (1979). Aerodynamics of the Air-plane. McGraw-Hill Companies
5. Theodorsen, T. and Mutchler, W. (1935). “General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献