Biodiversity Conservation of Western Himalayas: A Pluralistic Approach

Author:

Ram Dhiman Mast,P. Muthanarasimha Girish

Abstract

The conservation of biodiversity has been a matter of serious concern all over the world. Regions of the world with rapidly changing land use and economies require transdisciplinary focus to adequately address today’s challenges for conservation, local livelihoods, and development. Himalayan ecosystem sustainability is vital for the employment of approximately 1.3 billion people in Asia. The Indian Himalayan Region (IHR) are special for their natural geological wealth, forest, flora, fauna and biodiversity, snow, ice and water bodies, traditional knowledge, and mountain agriculture. It is now widely accepted that the rich and diverse Himalayan ecosystem is fragile. The regions are predominantly populated by local societies. Live in biodiversity wealthy regions of the country, the neighboring mountainous communities are dependent upon biodiversity for meeting their livelihood security. Hence, sustaining biodiversity in the mountain region also means defending the benefit of the people. Recognition of the Himalayas as one of 34 global biodiversity hotspots aptly reflects its wide-ranging ecological significance. Societies across the world have had long-standing traditions of using and caring for nature, but the formal, mainstream, and largely western ‘conservation movement’ is only about 120 years old. Biocultural approaches to conservation represent a synthesis of theory across multiple fields linked to biodiversity conservation, including social-ecological systems thinking, commons theory, bio-cultural diversity and heritage, indigenous natural resource management and traditional ecological knowledge, and different models of participatory and people-centered conservation. This synthesis points to the potential for pluralistic, partnership-based, and dynamic approaches to guide conservation processes.

Publisher

IntechOpen

Reference60 articles.

1. McNeely JA, Miller KR, Reid WV, Mittermeier RA, Werner TB. Conserving the world’s Biological Diversity. Gland: IUCN, WRI, CI, WWF-US, and the World Bank; 1990

2. Jenkins M, Schaap B. Background analytical study—Forest ecosystem services. In: Background Study Prepared for the Thirteenth Session of the United Nations Forum on Forests. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystem and human wel-being. Vol.5. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005. p. 5

3. Munang R, Thiaw I, Thompson J, Ganz D, Girvetz E, Rivington M. Sustaining Forests: Investing in Our Common Future. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP Policy Series, Issue 5; 2011

4. Tse-ring K, Sharma E, Chettri N, Shrestha AB. Climate Change Vulnerability of Mountain Ecosystems in the Eastern Himalayas—Synthesis Report. Kathmandu, Nepal: ICIMOD; 2010

5. Kumar A, Sharma MP. Carbon stock estimation in the catchment of KotliBhel 1A hydroelectric reservoir, Uttarakhand, India. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2016;134:365-369

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3