Author:
Sparkle Tanaya,Roy Debanshu
Abstract
There is currently an increasing number of international refugees due to political warfare and natural calamities. Over the recent years, countries are shying away from assisting with the provision of healthcare to this vulnerable population either in their home country through humanitarian aid and services or in the host country by providing free healthcare coverage. World leaders and politicians have attempted to ignore the morality behind these decisions and have put forth a false narrative of scarcity and racism to appeal to the population of developed countries. As this question remains unsolved, we have attempted to look at the question from the perspective of our moral obligations as a species. We have discussed some of the popular moral theories that support providing healthcare services to global refugees and refuted theories that object to the same. We conclude with a brief look at the direction that countries could take without violating established moral code while attempting (without evidence) to prioritize the welfare of their citizens.
Reference43 articles.
1. Heslehurst N, Brown H, Pemu A, et al. Perinatal health outcomes and care among asylum seekers and refugees: A systematic review of systematic reviews. BMC Medicine. 2018;16 [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1064-0
2. Davies A, Basten A, Frattini C. Migration: A social determinant of migrants’ health. Eurohealth. 2009;16:10-12
3. Cunliffe K. Holding the world accountable: A philosophical analysis of the refugee crisis and the moral obligations of the global community. Political Science. 2017. Available from: https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/undergraduate_honors_theses/kw52j852b
4. Ozgumus AM, Ekmekci PE. Refugee health: A moral discussion. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2019;21:1-3
5. UNHCR. Human Rights and Refugees Fact Sheet No.20. Availabe from: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FactSheet20en.pdf