Author:
Badiuzzaman Md,Jiang Zixi,Thakur Sweta,Rahman Shafiqur,Mustaneer Rahman Mohammad
Abstract
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) play a significant role in proliferating universal online education regardless of learners’ limitations and backgrounds. Regrettably, the MOOC movement has been challenged by the inequality in accessing essential digital technologies, known as the digital divide. Research has identified multiple forms of digital divide beyond the binary access difference. The evolving forms of the digital divide have been induced in MOOCs due to the access, skill, and outcomes gap, which drives a digital divide cycle. The concept of the multilevel digital divide in MOOCs is a rising concern that demands thoughtful actions by MOOCs stakeholders. This book chapter discusses the intertwined multilevel digital divide and MOOCs and proposes potential solutions to break the digital divide cycle and bridge the gap. Additionally, current MOOCs platforms have digital accessibility issues that hinder learners with disabilities from participating and can result in further inequalities. In order to address the accessibility issues, this chapter describes the application of web content accessibility guidelines and universal design for learning concepts that may assist associated people with MOOCs to bridge the digital divide and promote equitable MOOCs.
Reference64 articles.
1. Alahmadi H, Alamri A, Reka H, Roland J. Policy Brief Leveraging Digital Technology to Bridge The Global Knowledge Divide: The Promise of Moocs Revisited. Task Force 7 G20 Support for SDGs and Development Cooperation; 2020
2. Schuwer R, Gil-Jaurena I, Aydin CH, Costello E, Dalsgaard C, Brown M, et al. Opportunities and threats of the MOOC movement for higher education: The European perspective. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2015;:20-38
3. Sosa-Díaz MJ, Fernández-Sánchez MR. Massive open online courses (MOOC) within the framework of international developmental cooperation as a strategy to achieve sustainable development goals. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020;:1-23
4. Johnston RB. Arsenic and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. In: Arsenic Research and Global Sustainability. Vol. 2016. AS: Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Arsenic in the Environment; 2016. pp. 12-14
5. Rohs M, Ganz M. MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2015;:1-19