Are African Stock Markets Inefficient or Adaptive? Empirical Literature

Author:

A. Obalade Adefemi,Muzindutsi Paul-Francois

Abstract

This chapter reviews empirical studies on weak form of efficiency with the aim of establishing whether the African market is inefficient or adaptive. The reviewed studies are categorised based on their methodological approaches to compare the power of linear and non-linear models in testing for weak-form efficiency. The studies on calendar anomalies, an indication of weak-form inefficiency, are reviewed to assess whether these anomalies are adaptive as portrayed by the relatively recent theory of adaptive market hypothesis (AMH). The scope of reviewed studies is also extended to developed and emerging markets to gain a broad comparison of the findings. This review revealed that non-linear dependence has been revealed in stock returns suggesting that non-linear models are best fit to test for the stock market efficiency. Reviewed studies produced contradictory findings with some supporting and others rejecting weak-form efficiency. Thus, most studies support the AMH, which suggests that market efficiencies and anomalies are time changing. This chapter concludes that most of the existing studies on AMH have been carried out in markets other than Africa, and hence, further empirical studies on the evolving and changing nature of efficiency in African stock markets are recommended.

Publisher

IntechOpen

Reference178 articles.

1. Fama EF. The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices. The Journal of Business. 1965;38(1):34-105.

2. Urquhart A, Hudson R. Efficient or adaptive markets? Evidence from major stock markets using very long run historic data. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2013;28:130-42.

3. Kok S, Munir Q, Bahron A, editors. Technical Anomalies: A Theoretical Review2014.

4. Helena N. A Multifactor Approach in Understanding Asset Pricing Anomalies: An empirical study of the factor model in the Budapest Stock Market. 2009.

5. Bodie Z, Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. Essentials of Investments. 7th ed. New York: Mc-Graw Hill/Irwin; 2011.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3