Author:
Güvenbaş Mesut,Sayligil Omur
Abstract
Organ transplantation is an issue that concerns two people (donor and recipient) at the same time in terms of the right to life, which is the most basic human right. The direct utility arising from organ transplantation involves the patient to whom the organ is transplanted, and the indirect utility relates to the donor. Today, the decision to obtain an organ from a living donor is based on the idea of doing something good by those who sacrifice themselves for their relatives. The person who donates an organ treats their body as an instrument and uses their willpower on it. If the statement “I will care about the health of others” is accepted as a universal principle, it will be very important to establish a balance between the duty of caring for the health of others and protecting one’s own health. If we want to introduce a new approach to be adopted in the assessment of living donors in society, we must look at the real situation in terms of utility, altruism, and volunteering. This Chapter thus evaluates organ transplantation from living donors in terms of utility, altruism, and volunteering.
Reference40 articles.
1. Elçioğlu Ö. Böbrek Naklinde Canlı Vericiler: Gönüllülüğü Belirlemede Puanlama ve Derecelendirme Modeli Önerisi, In: Erdemir, A.D. et al. editors. Organ ve Doku Naklinde Tıp Etiği ve Tıp Hukuku Sorunları, I. Uluslararası Tıp Etiği ve Tıp Hukuku Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2007. p. 33-53.
2. Biller-Andorno N. Voluntariness in Living-Related Organ Donation. Transplantation. 2011;92(6):617-619. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182279120
3. Al-Khader A.A. A Model for Scoring And Grading Willingness of a Potential Living Related Donor. J.Med.Ethics; 2005;31: 338-340. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.009282
4. Wright L, Faith K, Richardson R, Grant D. Ethical Guidelines for the Evaluation of Living Organ Donors. J. Can. Chir. 2004;47(6):408-413.
5. The Authors for the Live Organ Donor Consensus Group. Consensus Statement on the Live Organ Donor. JAMA, 2000;284(22):2919-2926. DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.22.2919.