Inclusion of Home-Centred Women

Author:

Bordunos Aleksandra,Kosheleva Sofia,Zyryanova Anna

Abstract

Firms are highly interested in better inclusion of women with childcare commitments, especially for leadership positions, as reward for higher work groups’ gender diversity is valuable. Gender diversity became topical issue in corporate social responsibility of companies. However, many firms report that gender diversity is stalled, due to conflicting stereotypes about social roles of employees. Hakim’s influential preference theory suggests explanations of how women choose between productive and reproductive work. According to it, there are three types of employed women: home-centred, work-centred and adaptive workers, who combine both. Three options for preference assume three alternative frames of reference. Inclusion-related initiatives aim to reshape such frames by addressing employees’ identity work through readjusting managerially inspired discourses. Current research narrows the focus to the most vulnerable of them – home-centred women. We referred to responses of 721 mothers with previous working experience, from the biggest cities in Russia to find answers to the following questions: what affects home-centred women in their decision to return to the same employer after the maternity leave and what causes them to quit. We enriched empirical analysis with a theoretical review of initiatives helping to readjust corresponding stereotypes.

Publisher

IntechOpen

Reference59 articles.

1. Woetzel J, Madgavkar A, Ellingrud K, Labaye E, Devillard S, Kutcher E, Manyika J, Dobbs R, Krishnan M. How advancing women’s equality can add $12 trillion to global growth [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/how-advancing-womens-equality-can-add-12-trillion-to-global-growth [Accessed: 2021-01-23].

2. Kramer A. Why Gender Diversity Is Stalled. 2019. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/andiekramer/2019/12/05/why-gender-diversity-is-stalled/?sh=24a1eb044fad [Accessed: 2021-01-23].

3. Cabrera-Fernández A. I, Martínez-Jiménez R, Hernández-Ortiz MJ. Women’s participation on boards of directors: A review of the literature. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. 2016. 8 (1): 69-89.

4. Ellemers N, Rink F. Diversity in work groups. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2016. 11: 49-53.

5. Murray D. The Benefits Of Gender Diversity At Work. [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2019/03/21/the-benefits-of-gender-diversity-at-work/?sh=19d1f545ba4a [Accessed: 2021-01-23].

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3