Author:
Vanasupa Linda,Barabino Gilda
Abstract
In the aftermath of World War II, Einstein urged scientists to develop a substantively new thinking, lest we suffer a technology-enabled self-destruction. In this chapter, we will unfold the emerging scientific findings that serve as vectors, pointing to the same conclusion: the educational foundation that has brought about Industry 5.0 is causal to brain development that not only undermines our ability to address our emerging complex societal challenges, but biases us toward inhumane logic. We will outline a science of holism, the profoundly new thinking urged by Einstein. This science is rooted in nature’s ontology of dynamic complexity. An engineering education reflecting this new thinking will be described along with the novel developmental capacities afforded by it. The chapter will end by considering questions that need to be resolved to manifest such a radical shift in engineering education.
Reference68 articles.
1. National Society of Professional Engineers [Internet]. Alexandria, VA: National Society of Professional Engineers; 2021. Ethics /Engineers’ Creed; 1957 [cited 2021 Jan 28]; Available from: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics/engineers-creed
2. Capra F, Luisi, PL. The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge University Press:2014.
3. Lakoff G. Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science. 2012;4(4):773-785.
4. Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago:University of Chicago Press;1980.
5. Gibbs R. Embodiment and cognitive science. New York:Cambridge University Press; 2006.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Preliminary Application of Reductionism and Holism in Teaching Mechanical Engineering Materials;Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Education, Information Management and Service Science (EIMSS 2022);2022-12-29