Bureaucratic Mismanagement: Understanding Refugees and Asylum Seekers Scapegoating in the Context of Global Policy Shifts and South Africa’s Evolving Approach

Author:

Skota Siyamthanda

Abstract

Rather than addressing the bureaucratic mismanagement causing system overload, there is a prevalent tendency to scapegoat asylum seekers and refugees. This scapegoating motivates the introduction of new legal and policy changes. Consequently, governments, including South Africa, respond by introducing measures that scapegoat migrants instead of strengthening their bureaucratic asylum seeker systems. This chapter, based on an examination of recent policy and legal documents, contends that South Africa’s recent shifts in policy regarding asylum seekers and refugees are indicative of a global trend of restricting the rights of this vulnerable population group. These shifts encompass not only the reduced benefits for applicants but also result from overwhelmed asylum seeker systems. The broader issue highlighted in this chapter is the global perception of migration as a crisis, leading governments worldwide to portray asylum seekers and refugee movements as a crisis. This chapter underscores the need to address this problem, emphasising its impact on asylum seekers, refugees, and international refugee governance systems.

Publisher

IntechOpen

Reference34 articles.

1. de Haas H. How Migration Really Works: A Factful Guide to the Most Divisive Issue in Politics. UK: Random House; 2023

2. Selee A, Fratzke S, Davidoff-Gore S, Freier LF. Expanding Protection Options? Flexible Approaches to Status for Displaced Syrians, Venezuelans, and Ukrainians; 2024. Available from:

3. South African Government. White Paper on International Migration for South Africa 2017. Pretoria: Government Printing Works; 2017. Available from:

4. Handmaker J, Nalule C. Border enforcement policies and reforms in South Africa (1994-2020). In: ISS Working Paper Series/General Series. Vol. 686. The Netherlands: Institute of Social Studies; 2021. pp. 1-37

5. Hiropoulos A. Migration and detention in South Africa. A review of the applicability and impact of the legislative framework on foreign nationals. In: APCOF Policy Paper (18). 2017. Available from:

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3