Author:
Moghimi Bahman,Kamga Camille
Abstract
Giving priority to public transport vehicles at traffic signals is one of the traffic management strategies deployed at emerging smart cities to increase the quality of service for public transit users. It is a key to breaking the vicious cycle of congestion that threatens to bring cities into gridlock. In that cycle, increasing private traffic makes public transport become slower, less reliable, and less attractive. This results in deteriorated transit speed and reliability and induces more people to leave public transit in favor of the private cars, which create more traffic congestion, generate emissions, and increase energy consumption. Prioritizing public transit would break the vicious cycle and make it a more attractive mode as traffic demand and urban networks grow. A traditional way of protecting public transit from congestion is to move it either underground or above ground, as in the form of a metro/subway or air rail or create a dedicated lane as in the form of bus lane or light rail transit (LRT). However, due to the enormous capital expense involved or the lack of right-of-way, these solutions are often limited to few travel corridors or where money is not an issue. An alternative to prioritizing space to transit is to prioritize transit through time in the form of Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Noteworthy, transit and specifically bus schedules are known to be unstable and can be thrown off their schedule with even small changes in traffic or dwell time. At the same time, transit service reliability is an important factor for passengers and transit agencies. Less variability in transit travel time will need less slack or layover time. Thus, transit schedulers are interested in reducing transit travel time and its variability. One way to reach this goal is through an active intervention like TSP. In this chapter a comprehensive review of transit signal priority models is presented. The studies are classified into different categories which are: signal priority and different control systems, passive versus active priority, predictive transit signal priority, priority with connected vehicles, multi-modal signal priority models, and other practical considerations.
Reference80 articles.
1. R. J. Salter and J. Shahi, “PREDICTION OF EFFECTS OF BUS-PRIORITY SCHEMES BY USING COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNIQUES,” in Transportation Research Record, 1979
2. K. & Associates, U. S. F. T. Administration, T. C. R. Program, and T. D. Corporation, Transit capacity and quality of service manual. Transportation Research Board, 2003
3. T. Kimpel, J. Strathman, R. Bertini, and S. Callas, “Analysis of transit signal priority using archived TriMet bus dispatch system data,” Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, no. 1925, pp. 156-166, 2005
4. Y. Lin, X. Yang, N. Zou, and M. Franz, “Transit signal priority control at signalized intersections: a comprehensive review,” Transp. Lett., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 168-180, Jun. 2015
5. K. Hu, S. Skehan, and R. Gephart, “IMPLEMENTING A SMART TRANSIT PRIORITY SYSTEM FOR METRO RAPID BUS IN LOS ANGELES,” presented at the Transportation Research Board 80th Annual Meeting, 2001
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献