Abstract
Geriatrics is an applied science as its practice is an art of medicine. As a scientific discipline, there exists a potential race for measurements. Frailty stands as among poorly defined concepts in geriatric medicine. There are philosophical, circumstantial, and practical justifications behind this rather seemingly clinical tragedy. This chapter contributes toward reliability and validity aspects of currently applied frailty scales and indicators across different population base. It acknowledges the contribution of Fried’s frailty scale. It also describes different frailty scales and indicators tested in America, Europe, and Asia. Lastly, the chapter contrasts the popular belief behind applications of Cronbach’s α coefficient of test scores for reliability assessment in clinical research. Other research gaps are also highlighted including merging clinical research findings in geriatrics with psychosocial aspects under the emerging field of geropsychology. It also proposes a solution for usage in future studies that aim at assessing reliability of test scores in clinical and biomedical sciences.
Reference65 articles.
1. A giant of geriatric medicine – Professor Bernard Isaacs (1924-1995) British Geriatrics Society. Available from: https://www.bgs.org.uk/geriatricmedicinearchive/bgsarchive/biographies/a-giant-of-geriatric-medicine-professor-bernard-isaacs-1924-1995 [Accessed: March 10, 2020]
2. Morley J. The new geriatric giants. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 2017;33(3):xi-xii
3. Emmet K. Nonspecific and atypical presentation of disease in the older patient. Geriatrics. 1998;53(2):50-60
4. Jarrett P, Rockwood K, Carver D, Stolee P, Cosway S. Illness presentation in elderly patients. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1995;155(10):1060-1064
5. Gavazzi G, Krause K. Ageing and infection. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2002;2(11):659-666