Perspective Chapter: We expect Effective Leadership from Leaders, but is this the Case in Reality? Reframing a Much-Hyped Phenomenon by Investigating the Antithesis

Author:

Karp Tom

Abstract

Leaders too often cause problems that challenge the effectivity of society and organisations; they exhibit bad leadership. This is an under-communicated and under-researched challenge, which is therefore investigated in the antithesis: What if leaders do not execute the effective leadership we expect of them, but quite the opposite, create problems and in-effectivity in the organisations they should serve? This is a more common challenge than many assume. Leadership is an inflated phenomenon that has somewhat distanced itself from organisational realities. There is, therefore, every reason to downscale the expectations of what can be achieved by leaders. This contribution is a nuanced analysis of leaders and their exercise of leadership. A powerful leadership industry has its own interests in promoting only the positive effects of leadership, with little interest in addressing human fallibility within the field. Other perspectives and research methods are therefore needed to avoid losing credibility and legitimacy as a research field and a resource base for professional practice. Given the human and financial toll that fallible leaders take, the advice for organisations and institutions is to develop better policies, systems, and processes that weed out negative and destructive behaviour.

Publisher

IntechOpen

Reference105 articles.

1. Yukl GA. Leadership in Organizations. 8th ed. Boston, Ma: Pearson; 2013

2. Bass BM. The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. 4th ed. New York: Free Press; 2008

3. Bennis W. The challenges of leadership in the modern world: Introduction to the special issue. American Psychologist. 2007;(1):2-5

4. Day DV, Antonakis J. The Nature of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2012

5. Drucker PF. Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practises. New York: Harper Business; 1973

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3