Communication and Leadership for Improving ERM Effectiveness

Author:

Wolter Thomas

Abstract

Many companies implementing Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) struggle with its effectiveness. Available studies of risk practitioners’ practices describe and categorise phenomena related to establishing ERM. This qualitative study uses a cross-sectional field design to explore risk practitioners’ communication and leadership practices for achieving and maintaining effectiveness. It forms a practical guide for risk practitioners to manage ERM effectiveness and for organisations to optimise risk development programs. Risk practitioners apply four practice episodes—the first aims at creating shared knowledge and meaning. The second episode emphasises the value-creating capabilities of the organisational ERM. Leadership, the third practice episode, aims at increasing influence in the decision-making processes. Relationship management is the fourth episode centred on balancing independence and involvement. Executing these practices implies risk practitioners gaining referent and expert power, applying participatory, visionary, and affiliated leadership styles, identifying stakeholder needs, and recognising organisational knowledge barriers.

Publisher

IntechOpen

Reference65 articles.

1. Beasley MS. What is Enterprise Risk Management? NC State: Poole College of Management; 2016. Available from: https://erm.ncsu.edu/az/erm/i/chan/library/What_is_Enterprise_Risk_Management.pdf. [Accessed: 23 May 2020]

2. Schiller F, Prpich G. Learning to organise risk management in organisations: What future for enterprise risk management? Journal of Risk Research. 2014;17(8):999-1017

3. Beasley MS, Branson BC, Hancock BV. The State of Risk Oversight. NC State: Poole College of Management; 2021. Available from: https://erm.ncsu.edu/az/erm/i/chan/library/2021-risk-oversight-report-erm-ncstate.pdf. [Accessed: 16 June 2022]

4. Deloitte. Global Risk Management Survey. 11th ed. Deloitte; 2018. Available from: https://www2.deloitte.com/bg/en/pages/finance/articles/global-risk-management-survey-2019.html. [Accessed: 7 June 2020]

5. KPMG. Enterprise Risk Management Benchmarking Study. KPMG. Available from: https://advisory.kpmg.us/content/dam/advisory/en/pdfs/erm-benchmarking-brochure.pdf; 2019. [Accessed: 6 June 2020]

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3