Hybrid Intervention Based on Virtual Intervention with Marginalized Organizations, Outcast Groups, and Professional Users of Technology

Author:

Jaafari Fatemeh,Yazdani Mahtab,Khaghani Mitra,Batori Asifa,Hajizadeh Kazem

Abstract

Technological developments have seriously affected all areas of life, including sciences and various professions, and social work has not been immune from these effects. Therefore, fundamental questions are raised, such as how social work has adapted to technological changes. How has this profession been able to enrich its field of knowledge, skills, and ethical standards in terms of extensive technological changes? Are social workers able to use technology-based services for their clients? Are all clients able to use technology-based services? Has technology increased or decreased the severity of social exclusion of clients? Therefore, to answer these questions, qualitative research was conducted using structured interviews with 15 social workers in various public, private, and charitable institutions in Tehran, who were identified through targeted sampling. After that, the findings were analyzed based on coding, and five main themes were extracted, which include virtual citizenship, virtual empowerment, smart client management, and virtual marginalization. The conducted research shows that social workers do not consider the use of technological tools as a fundamental right of the client and do not consider it among the client’s basic needs.

Publisher

IntechOpen

Reference5 articles.

1. Greene J, Burleson B. Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2003

2. Bachmann-Medick D. Cultural Turns: New in the Study of Culture. Translated from the German by Adam Blauhut. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter; 2016

3. Forte JA. Skills for Using Theory in Social Work (32 Lessons for Evidence-Informed Practice). New York City: Cataloguing in Publication; 2014

4. Bown GA. Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research method. Qualitative Research Journal. 2009;(2):27-40

5. Healy K. Social Work Theories in Context (Creating Frameworks for Practice). New York City: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3