Author:
Yoram Kavana Pius,Kija Bukombe John,Kija Hamza,Nindi Stephen,Nkwabi Ally,Lipende Iddi,Maijo Simula,Naftali Baraka,M. Kakengi Victor,Ntalwila Janemary,Ndimuligo Sood,Fyumagwa Robert
Abstract
In Tanzania, pure grasslands cover is estimated to be 60,381 km2, about 6.8% of the total land area, and is distributed in different parts. These grasslands are diverse in dominant grass species depending on rainfall, soil type, altitude, and management or grazing system. They support livestock and wildlife distributed in different eco-tomes and habitats of the country. The potential of grasslands for the livelihood of rural people is explicit from the fact that local people depend solely on natural production to satisfy their needs for animal products. Analysis of grazing lands indicated that livestock population, production of meat, and milk from grasslands increased. But the wildlife population, when considered in terms of livestock equivalent units (Large Herbivore Units) showed a declining trend. The contribution of grasslands to the total volume of meat produced in the country showed a declining state, while milk production showed a slight increase. This situation entails a need to evaluate the grasslands of Tanzania to ascertain their potential for supporting people’s livestock, wildlife, and livelihood. This study concluded that more research is needed to establish the possibility of grasslands to keep large numbers of grazing herbivores for sustainable livestock and wildlife production.
Reference48 articles.
1. Peeters A, Beaufoy G, Canals RM, De Vliegher A, Huyghe C, Isselstein J, et al. Grassland term definitions and classifications adapted to the diversity of European grassland-based systems. Grassland Science in Europe. 2014;19:743-750
2. Allen VG, Batello C, Berretta E, Hodgson J, Kothmann M, Li X, et al. An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science. 2011;66(1):2-29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2010.00780.x
3. Venter ZS, Hawkins H-J, Cramer MD. Cattle don’t care: Animal behaviour is similar regardless of grazing management in grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2019;272:175-187
4. Turpie J, Forsythe K, Knowles A, Blignaut J, Letley G. Mapping and valuation of South Africa's ecosystem services: A local perspective. Ecosystem Services. 2017;27:179-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.008
5. Baskent EZ. A framework for characterizing and regulating ecosystem services in a management planning context. Forests. 2020;11(1):102. DOI: 10.3390/f11010102