Author:
Arbor Sage,Arbor Tafline,Berg-Cross Linda
Abstract
Before the industrial revolution, living standards largely hinged on population size. With the advent of the industrial age, technological progress became the main influencer. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) initially served as a primary indicator of national well-being, tying economic growth directly to overall quality of life (QoL). Nevertheless, GDP falls short in encompassing diverse elements of QoL, such as environmental health, personal well-being, and cultural richness. Contemporary QoL indicators now encompass life expectancy, mortality rates, and satisfaction surveys. Depending on a nation’s GDP, QoL strategies vary. Lower-income countries benefit more from cost-effective public health measures, while affluent nations can invest in sophisticated biomedical research and comprehensive mental health care. The success of these interventions largely rests on the unique economic, political, and cultural landscapes of each nation. Therefore, monitoring these metrics at the national level and customizing interventions will optimize improvements in well-being.
Reference38 articles.
1. Arbor S. Ethical Issues Which Have Prevented the U.S. from Maximizing Quality of Life Years. London: IntechOpen; 2021. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/76548
2. Stearns PN, editor. The Routledge History of Death since 1800. London: Routledge; 2020. 568 p
3. Remes J, Linzer K, Singhal S, Dewhurst M, Dash P, Woetzel J, et al. Prioritizing health: A prescription for prosperity. Executive Summary McKinsey Global Institute Report. Jul 2020. p. 26
4. Schipper H. Quality of life. Journal of Psychosociety Oncology. 1990;8(2-3):171-185
5. Spilker B. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 1259. Available from: http://www.gbv.de/dms/bs/toc/185460984.pdf