Detection and Warning of Tsunamis Generated by Marine Landslides
Abstract
Seismic signals provide an effective early detection of tsunamis that are generated by earthquakes, and for epicentres in the hard-rock subduction zones there is a robust analysis procedure that uses a global network of seismometers. For earthquakes with epicentres in soft layers in the upper subduction zones the processes are slower and the seismic signals have lower frequencies. For these soft-rock earthquakes a given earthquake magnitude can produce a bigger tsunami amplitude than the same earthquake magnitude in a hard rock rupture. Numerical modelling for the propagation from earthquake-generated tsunamis can predict time of arrivals at distant coastal impact zones. A global network of deep-water pressure sensors is used to detect and confirm tsunamis in the open ocean. Submarine landslide and coastal collapse tsunamis, meteo-tsunamis, and other disturbances with no significant seismicity must rely on the deep-water pressure sensors and HF radar for detection and warning. Local observations by HF radar at key impact sites detect and confirm tsunami time and amplitude in the order of 20–60 minutes before impact. HF radar systems that were developed for mapping the dynamics of coastal currents have demonstrated a capability to detect tsunamis within about 80 km of the coast and where the water depth is less than 200 m. These systems have now been optimised for tsunami detection and some installations are operating continuously to provide real-time data into tsunami warning centres. The value of a system to warn of hazards is realised only when coastal communities are informed and aware of the dangers.
Reference33 articles.
1. Richter, C.F., Elementary Seismology, 768 pp., 205 illus. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, and Bailey Bros. and Swinfen Ltd., 75 London, 1958. www.US.macmillan.com 2. National Geographic Society. Tsunamis. National Geographic. Accessed March 1, 2014. http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/natural-disasters/tsunami-profile/. 3. Melgar, D., Allen, R. M., Riquelme, S., Geng, J., Bravo, F., Baez, J. C., et al. (2016). Local tsunami warnings: Perspectives from recent large events. Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 1109–1117. DOI: 10.1002/2015GL067100 4. Lay, T., C.J. Ammon, H. Kanamori, Y. Yamazaki, K.F. Cheung and A.R. Hutko, The 25 October 2020 Mentawai tsunami earthquake (Mw 7.8) and tsunami hazard presented by shallow megathrust ruptures, Geophys. Res. Letters, 38, 5pp, L06302, 2011. DOI: 10.1029/2010GL046552. 5. Newman, A.V., G. Hayes, Y. Wei and J. Convers, The 25 October 2010 Mentawai tsunami earthquake, from real-time discriminants, finite-fault rupture, and tsunami excitation, Geophys. Res. Letters, 38, L05302, 2011. DOI: 10.1029/2010GL046498.
|
|