Hydrodynamical Numerical Modeling of Coastal Areas
-
Published:2024-06-12
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:Oceanography - Relationships of the Oceans with the Continents, Their Biodiversity and the Atmosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
Harari Joseph,Braga Ribeiro Renan,Hora Yang Samuel,Souza Ruiz Matheus,Regina de Gouveia Souza Célia,de Souza Ferreira Regina,Marinho Chayonn
Abstract
Coastal areas are important, due to the great population and activities that occur there. Oceanographic conditions in coastal waters differ in many aspects of those in the open ocean: In general, spatial and temporal variations are greater. Coastal management requires environmental monitoring, commonly done by direct measurements, remote sensing, and the processing of numerical models. This chapter deals with the hydrodynamical numerical modeling of coastal areas, presenting its basic concepts, implementation and use strategies, and examples of model outputs and practical applications. These models aim to reproduce the coastal circulation, by computing the time evolution of the spatial distribution of sea level, currents, temperature, salinity, and density—considering the respective forcing of tides, winds, ocean–atmosphere exchanges and river contributions. Several examples of model outputs and coupling are presented, with maps of the distribution of temperature and salinity, which are important seawater properties; waste discharges by submarine emissaries, giving support to public health service; fate of plastic debris in the ocean, among others. Despite the enormous feasibility and utility of modern high-resolution numerical models, some warning must be considered, such as checking all the inputs and comparing the results to reliable independent information before their dissemination.
Reference27 articles.
1. Small C, Cohen JE. Continental physiography, climate and the global distribution of human population. Current Anthropology. 2004;45(2):269-277 2. IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2021. In: Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, et al, editors. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2021. p. 2391 3. Church JA, Clark PU, Cazenave A, Gregory JM, Jevrejeva S, Levermann A, et al. Sea Level Change. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, et al, editors. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2013. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.026 4. Losada IJ, Gomez-Erache M, Lacambra C, Rirver E, Silva R, Toimil A. Coastal areas. In: Moreno JM, Laguna-Defior C, Barros V, Calvo Buendía E, Marengo JA, Oswald Spring U, editors. Adaptation to Climate Change Risks in Ibero-American Countries. Madrid, Spain: RIOCCADAPT Report McGraw Hill; 2020. pp. 541-580 5. Marengo JA, Nunes LH, Souza CRG, Hosokawa EK, Pedro GR, Harari J, et al. Risk management and vulnerability to sea level rise in Brazil, with emphasis on the legacy of the METROPOLE Project in Santos. Derbyana. 2022;43:e768. DOI: 10.14295/derb.v43.768
|
|