Abstract
Interspinous devices (or spacers) are currently used in lumbar spine surgery, but their use is still controversial, mainly due to confusion between so-called first and second-generation spacers, and unrespect of formal indications to implant. Our first aim is trying to offer an interpretation for a correct indication of surgical implantation, paying additional attention to those pathological conditions in which these devices must not be used; second, to identify the right clinico-surgical method to avoid potential errors in this surgery; third, to stress those surgical tricks directed to perform a successful implant of these spacers.
Reference19 articles.
1. Sénégas J. Lumbar dynamic stabilization with the Wallis implant. Argospine News & Journal. 2009;(2):48-55
2. Kabir SMR, Gupta SR, Casey ATH. Lumbar interspinous spacers; a systematic review of clinical and biomechanical evidence. Spine. 2010;:E1499-E1506
3. Irace C, Giannachi L, Amato V, Corona C. The BacJac interspinous device in the treatment of lumbar spine degenerative disorders: A prospective study and 2-year follow-up results. Journal of Spine. 2014;:163-168
4. Schulte TL, Hurschler C, Haversath M, Liljenqvist U, Bullmann V, Filler TJ, et al. The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression. European Spine Journal. 2008;:1057-1065
5. Kim KA, McDonald M, Pik JHT, Khoueir P, Wang MY. Dynamic intraspinous spacer technology for posterior stabilization: case-control study on the safety, sagittal angulation, and pain outcome al 1-year follow-up evaluation. Neurosurgery Focus. 2007;(1):E7