Author:
Kislitsyna Natalia,Novikov Sergei
Abstract
Application of the developed technology of vitreous body visualization in patients with macular holes (MH) of different sizes provides a principally new approach to clinical and diagnostic examination based on the development (depending on the stage of the pathological process) of basic classification anatomical and morphological signs (elongation of the vitreous cisterns in anteroposterior direction, violation of the integrity of the vitreous cistern wall and probability of staining composition exit beyond stained cavities, the degree of adhesion of the vitreous body on the internal limiting surface, etc). and characterized by advantages over traditional MH classifications, which in general (based on the outlined recommendations) makes it possible to significantly increase the clinical effectiveness of vitreoretinal surgical intervention in comparison with traditional classifications.
Reference49 articles.
1. Duker JS et al. The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction and macular hole. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2611-2619
2. Sebag J. The vitreoretinal interface and its role in the pathogenesis of vitreomaculopathies. Der Ophthalmologe. 2015;112(1):10-19
3. Gass JDM. Reappraisal of biomicroscopic classification of stages of development of a macular hole. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1995;119(6):752-759
4. Kislitsyna NM, Novikov SV, Kolesnik SV, Veselkova MP, Dibirova S. Anatomic-topographic features of the anterior cortical layers of the vitreous body Fyodorov’s eye microsurgery Complex, Moscow, Russia. EC Ophthalmology. 2019;10(12):1-10
5. Lang Y, Zemel E, Miller B, et al. Retinal toxicity of intravitreal kenalog in albino rabbits. Retina. 2007;27(6):778-788