Perspective Chapter: Distinguishing Encrypted from Non-Encrypted Data

Author:

Järpe Eric,Gouchet Quentin

Abstract

Discriminating between encrypted and non-encrypted information is desired for many purposes. Much of the efforts in this direction in the literature is focused on deploying machine learning methods for the discrimination in streamed data which is transmitted in packets in communication networks. Here, however, the focus and the methods are different. The retrieval of data from computer hard drives that have been seized from police busts against suspected criminals is sometimes not straightforward. Typically the incriminating code, which may be important evidence in subsequent trials, is encrypted and quick deleted. The cryptanalysis of what can be recovered from such hard drives is then subject to time-consuming brute forcing and password guessing. To this end methods for accurate classification of what is encrypted code and what is not is of the essence. Here a procedure for discriminating encrypted code from non-encrypted is derived. Two methods to detect where encrypted data is located in a hard disk drive are detailed using passive change-point detection. Measures of performance of such methods are discussed and a new property for evaluation is suggested. The methods are then evaluated and discussed according to the performance measures.

Publisher

IntechOpen

Reference25 articles.

1. Malhotra P. Detection of encrypted streams for egress monitoring [thesis]. UMI Microform 1447482. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University; 2007

2. Razali NM, Wah YB. Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics. 2011;2(1):21-33. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267205556_Power_Comparisons_of_Shapiro-Wilk_Kolmogorov-Smirnov_Lilliefors_and_Anderson-Darling_Tests [Accessed: December 29, 2021]

3. Hahn, D, Apthorpe, N and Feamster, N. Detecting Compressed Cleartext Traffic from Consumer Internet of Things Devices [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.02722 [Accessed: December 29, 2021]

4. Choudhury P, Kumar KR, Nandi S, Athithan G. An empirical approach towards characterization of encrypted and unencrypted VoIP traffic. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2020;79:603-631. DOI: 10.1007/s11042-019-08088-w

5. Bassham LE, Rukhin A, Soto J, Nechvatal J, Smid M, Barker E, et al. A Statistical Test Suite for Random and Pseudorandom Number Generators for Cryptographic Applications, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Special Publication 800–22 [Internet]. 2010. Available from: https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=906762 [Accessed: December 29, 2021]

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3