Abstract
A tooth that has been properly treated endodontically should have a good prognosis. It can resume full function and if necessary serve satisfactory as an abutment for a fixed and removable partial denture. However special techniques are needed to restore such a tooth. Traditionally, a pulpless tooth received a dowel or post to “reinforce” it and a crown to “protect” it. Until the introduction of ZnPO4 cement in the last century. The major problem with their use was that of post retention. Currently, the clinician can use a variety of port and core systems for the different endodontic and restorative requirements. However, no single system provides the perfect restorative solution for every clinical circumstance, and each situation requires individual evaluation.
Reference75 articles.
1. Suna Toksavul, Muhittin Toman, Mehmet Sankanat, Ibrahim Nergiz and Petra Schmage , Effect of Noble Metal Alloy Post and Core Material on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth , European Journal Of Prosthodontics & Restorative Dentistry. March 2010,Vol 18, Issue 1.
2. Standlee J.P.Caputo A.A.Hanson E.C.Retention of endodontic dowels: Effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design.J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 39: 401
3. Sorensen J.A.Martinoff J.T.Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth.J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 51: 780-784
4. Colley IT Hampson EL Lehman ML ,Retention of post crown: An assessment of the relative efficiency of posts of different shapes and sizes.Br Dent J. 1968; 124: 63-69
5. Goodacre CJ. Designing tooth preparations for optimal success. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48(2):v-385.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献