Author:
M. Gansemer-Topf Ann,Genschel Ulrike,Hien Nguyen Xuan,Sourwine Jasmine,Wang Yuchen
Abstract
Despite efforts to close the gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), disparities still exist, especially in math intensive STEM (MISTEM) majors. Females and males receive similar academic preparation and overall, perform similarly, yet females continue to enroll in STEM majors less frequently than men. In examining academic preparation, most research considers performance measures individually, ignoring the possible interrelationships between these measures. We address this problem by using hierarchical agglomerative clustering – a statistical technique which allows for identifying groups (i.e., clusters) of students who are similar in multiple factors. We first apply this technique to readily available institutional data to determine if we could identify distinct groups. Results illustrated that it was possible to identify nine unique groups. We then examined differences in STEM enrollment by group and by gender. We found that the proportion of females differed by group, and the gap between males and females also varied by group. Overall, males enrolled in STEM at a higher proportion than females and did so regardless of the strength of their academic preparation. Our results provide a novel yet feasible approach to examining gender differences in STEM enrollment in postsecondary education.
Reference50 articles.
1. National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators 2020 [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20201
2. Crisp G, Nora A, Taggart A. Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal. 2009;46(4):924-942. DOI: 10.3102%2F0002831209349460
3. National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics, Table 326.30 [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d18/tables/dt18_326.30.asp
4. Nix S, Perez-Felkner L, Thomas K. Perceived mathematical ability under challenge: A longitudinal perspective on sex segregation among STEM degree fields. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015;6:530. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00530
5. Perez-Felkner L, Nix S, Thomas K. Gendered pathways: How mathematics ability beliefs shape secondary and postsecondary course and degree field choices. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8:386. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00386