Author:
Guitián-Montes Raquel,Amhaz-Escanlar Samer,Jorge-Mora Alberto,Carolina Presas-Presas Ana
Abstract
Throughout this chapter, we will discuss the treatment of greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus. Greater tuberosity fractures are common, and an increase is expected due to population aging. We can address these fractures in different ways to restore the anatomy and function of the patient, but surgery is usually selected for displaced fractures. The surgical approach remains unclear, and few data can guide surgeons in choosing one technique or another. We will discuss open versus less invasive and arthroscopic repair techniques for fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus, and we will try to underline the advantages and cons of each method and describe the evidence around each surgical technique. We will also include some tips and tricks that may be helpful to orthopedic surgeons to achieve an optimal outcome.
Reference52 articles.
1. Samuel R, Huntley A, Eva J, Lehtonen A, Joseph Xavier Robin A, Alexandra M, et al. Outcomes of surgical fixation of greater tuberosity fractures: A systematic review. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2020;(6):1119-1126. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.05.005
2. Gruson KI, Ruchelsman DE, Tejwani NC. Isolated tuberosity fractures of the proximal humeral: Current concepts. Injury. 2008;(3):284-298. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.09.022
3. Rouleau DM, Mutch J, Laflamme GY. Surgical treatment of displaced greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2016;(1):46-56. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00289
4. Warner JJ, Costouros JG, Gerber C. Fractures of the proximal humerus. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C, editors. Rockwood & Green’s Fractures in Adults. Ed. 6 ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott William and Wilkins; 2006. pp. 1161-1209
5. Le Minor JM, Tomasi JP, Segonds C, Duparc F. Arterial supply of the proximal humerus and its potential surgical applications. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2018;(7):831-839