Improved Memetic Algorithm for Economic Load Dispatch in a Large Hydropower Plant
Author:
Shang Ling,Li Xiaofei,Shi Haifeng,Kong Feng,Wang Ying
Abstract
This paper is intended to study the method of solving the economic load dispatch problem (ELDP) of hydropower plants via using memetic algorithm. Based on characteristics of economical operation of the hydropower plant, this paper proposes an improvement method of mutation operator and selection operator of memetic algorithm. Taking Three Gorges hydropower station in China as an example, the performance of memetic algorithm before and after improvement is tested separately. The test result shows that the average water consumption for simulation of the improved memetic algorithm is less than that for simulation of the standard memetic algorithm by 1.35%–16.19%. When the total load of the hydropower station is low (8GW-10GW), the water consumption for the improved memetic algorithm is less than that for the standard memetic algorithm by more than 10%. When the total load of the hydropower station is high (11GW-16GW), the water consumption for the improved memetic algorithm is less than that for the standard memetic algorithm by more than 1%. This shows that improvement of mutation operator and selection operator can improve the global and local optimization capacity of memetic algorithm a lot indeed. In addition, by comparing the optimization result of memetic algorithm with that of DP algorithm, it finds that the optimization result of improved memetic algorithm can reach the same precision of optimization result of DP algorithm. Therefore, using the improved memetic algorithm to solve the ELDP problem of large hydropower stations is practical and feasible. Since “curse of dimensionality” may occur frequently while using DP algorithm to solve the ELDP problem of large hydropower plants, as a new heuristic algorithm, memetic algorithm has obvious advantages in solving large-scale, complex, highly-dimensional and dynamic problems.
Reference44 articles.
1. Grosan, C., Abraham, A. Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithms: Methodologies, Architectures, and Reviews. In: Abraham A., Grosan C., Ishibuchi H. (eds.) Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithms. Studies in Computational Intelligence, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2007, 75:1-17 2. Kumar, M., Husian, M., Upreti, N., Gupta, D. Genetic algorithm: Review and application. International Journal of Information Technology and Knowledge Management, 2010, 2(2): 451-454 3. Tan, K.C., Lee, T. H., Khor, E.F. Evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective optimization: Performance assessments and comparisons. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2002, 17 (4):251-290 4. Sivaraj, R., Ravichandran, D. T. A review of selection methods in genetic algorithm. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2011, 3(5):3792-3797 5. Krasnogor, N. Memetic Algorithms. In: Rozenberg G., Bäck T., Kok J.N. (eds.) Handbook of Natural Computing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, 905-935
|
|