Affiliation:
1. Independent Researcher, Distributed Systems Consultant, Introspec Ltd, London, UK
Abstract
Electronic voting consistently fails to supplant conventional paper ballot due to a plethora of security shortcomings. Not only are traditional voting methods mediocre in terms of transparency, audit, and costs, but they also encompass a principal-agent problem, where acting governments have real capability for tampering. Here I propose Proof of Work by user devices to fortify integrity of votes as cast and seed-isolated time-based one-time passwords to force observable polling stations. Coupled with end-to-end verifiability, the measures proposed are intended to improve on the issues mentioned. A state would only issue single-use authorizations to vote, while an untrusted publisher would collect and publish two unrelatable lists; votes and voters. Eventually, anyone could tabulate results. Content distribution networks are shown to be instrumental security providers. Weaknesses of proposed architecture are also discussed.
Reference23 articles.
1. Olorunnipa T, Lee MYH. Trump’s election fraud falsehoods have cost taxpayers $519 million—and counting [Internet], The Washington Post; 2021 Feb 6 [cited 2023 Apr 30]. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2021/cost-trump-election-fraud/.
2. Oostveen A-M. Outsourcing democracy: losing control of e-voting in the Netherlands. Policy Internet. 2010;2: 201–220. doi:10.2202/1944-2866.1065.
3. Cortier V, Debant A, Gaudry P. A privacy attack on the Swiss Post e-voting system. In: Presented at the RWC 2022 - Real World Crypto Symposium, April 13. Grand Est: LORIA; 2022.
4. Saproo S, Warke V, Pote S, Dhumal R. Online voting system using homomorphic encryption. ITM Web Conf. 2020;32: 03023, doi:10.1051/itmconf/20203203023.
5. ElectionGuard - Structures and Processes [Internet] [cited 2023 Jul 30]. Available from: https://www.electionguard.vote/concepts/Structure_and_Processes/None.