The first decade of the Danish Palliative Care Database: improvements and ongoing challenges in the quality and use of specialised palliative care

Author:

Adsersen Mathilde,Hansen Maiken BangORCID,Neergaard Mette AsbjoernORCID,Sjøgren PerORCID,Guldin Mai-BrittORCID,Groenvold MogensORCID

Abstract

Background: Danish Palliative Care Database comprises five quality indicators: (1) Contact with specialised palliative care (SPC) among referred patients, (2) Waiting time of less than 10 days, (3) Proportion of patients who died from (A) cancer or (B) non-cancer diseases, and had contact with SPC, (4) Proportion of patients completing the patient-reported outcome measure at baseline (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL), and (5) Proportion of patients discussed at a multidisciplinary conference. Purpose: To investigate changes in the quality indicators from 2010 until 2020 in cancer and non-cancer patients. Patients/material: Patients aged 18+ years who died from 2010 until 2020. Method: Register-based study with the Danish Palliative Care Database as the main data source. Indicator changes were reported as percentage fulfilment. Results: From 2010 until 2020, the proportion of patients with non-cancer diseases in SPC increased slightly (2.5–7.2%). In 2019, fulfilment of the five indicators for cancer and non-cancer were: (1) 81% vs. 73%; (2) 73% vs. 68%; (3A) 50%; (3B) 2%; (4) 73% vs. 66%; (5) 73% vs. 65%. Whereas all other indicators improved, the proportion of patients waiting less than 10 days from referral to contact decreased. Differences between type of unit were found, mainly lower for hospice. Interpretation: Most patients in SPC had cancer. All indicators except waiting time improved during the 10-year period. The establishment of the Danish Palliative Care Database may have contributed to the positive development; however, SPC in Denmark needs to be improved, especially regarding a reduction in waiting time and enhanced contact for non-cancer patients.

Publisher

MJS Publishing, Medical Journals Sweden AB

Reference39 articles.

1. Groenvold M, Adsersen M, Hansen MB. Danish palliative care database. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:637–43.

2. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S99468

3. Lundström S, Axelsson B, Heedman PA, et al. Developing a national quality register in end-of-life care: the Swedish experience. Palliat Med. 2012;26(4):313–21.

4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216311414758

5. Brunner S, Heckel M, Zenz D, et al. [Health- and disease-related data of inpatients in palliative care units of the Comprehensive Cancer Centers and other hospitals in comparison-data from the Hospice and Palliative Care Register]. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2022;172(7–8):172–80.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3