Abstract
Background and purpose: Most displaced distal radius fractures (DRF) are treated nonoperatively, with reduction and immobilization in a cast. Studies assessing intra- or inter-observer agreement on radiologic measurements of casting position have not been published, which was the aim of our study.Patients and methods: Our study is based on the Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention (OSTPRE) study. All detected DRFs during the OSTPRE follow-up were retrieved and based on sample size calculations 50 fractures were randomly selected for the study. 5 independent reviewers measured dislocation parameters and wrist position in a cast from the radiographs. A linear mixed model was used to estimate the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and total deviance index (TDI) that were used to evaluate intra- and inter-observer agreement. We used Kappa values to determine intra- and inter-rater agreement on radiographically acceptable reduction of the DRF. Limits of acceptable position were those defined by Finnish Current Care Guidelines.Results: For radial inclination, radial shortening, and dorsal/volar tilt, intra- and inter-observer correlations were high (CCC > 0.76). In addition, measurements of wrist angle in a splint had high correlations (CCC > 0.78), whereas measurement of intra-articular gap and step had poor correlations (CCC < 0.52). The Kappa value for overall agreement on the radiographically acceptable position of the DRF was modest (0.59).Conclusion: Intra- and inter-observer repeatability of casting position of radial inclination, radial shortening, and dorsal/volar tilt were high whereas intra-articular gap and step had poor correlations.
Publisher
Medical Journals Sweden AB
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery
Reference17 articles.
1. Nellans K W, Kowalski E, Chung K C. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin 2012; 28: 113–25. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2012.02.001.
2. Solvang H W, Nordheggen R A, Clementsen S, Hammer OL, Randsborg P H. Epidemiology of distal radius fracture in Akershus, Norway, in 2010–2011. J Orthop Surg Res 2018; 13(1): 199. doi: 10.1186/s13018018-0904-0.
3. Working group set up by the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim and the Finnish Cardiac Society. Distal radius fracture: current care guidelines. Helsinki: Finnish Medical Society Duodecim; 2016.
4. Wichlas F, Haas N P, Lindner T, Tsitsilonis S. Closed reduction of distal radius fractures: does instability mean irreducibility? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133(8): 1073-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1758-x.
5. Bentohami A, Bijlsma T S, Goslings J C, de Reuver P, Kaufmann L, Schep N W L. Radiological criteria for acceptable reduction of extra-articular distal radial fractures are not predictive for patient-reported functional outcome. J Hand Surg Eur 2013; 38(5): 524-9. doi: 10.1177/1753193412468266.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献