Author:
Davies Andrew R,Sabharwal Sanjeeve,Liddle Alexander D,Zamora Bernarda,Rangan Amar,Reilly Peter
Abstract
Background and purpose: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) are used in the management of osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint. We aimed to determine whether TSA or HA resulted in a lower risk of adverse outcomes in patients of all ages with osteoarthritis and an intact rotator cuff and in a subgroup of patients aged 60 years or younger.Patients and methods: Shoulder arthroplasties recorded in the National Joint Registry, UK, between April 1, 2012 and June 30, 2021, were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics in England. Elective TSAs and HAs were matched on propensity scores based on 11 variables. The primary outcome was all-cause revision. Secondary outcomes were combined revision/non-revision reoperations, 30-day inpatient complications, 1-year mortality, and length of stay. 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.Results: 11,556 shoulder arthroplasties were included: 7,641 TSAs, 3,915 HAs. At 8 years 95% (CI 94–96) of TSAs and 91% (CI 90–92) of HAs remained unrevised. The hazard ratio (HR) varied across follow-up: 4-year HR 2.7 (CI 1.9–3.5), 8-year HR 2.0 (CI 0.5–3.5). Rotator cuff insufficiency was the most common revision indication. In patients aged 60 years or younger prosthesis survival at 8 years was 92% (CI 89–94) following TSA and 84% (CI 80–87) following HA.Conclusion: The risk of revision was higher following HA in patients with osteoarthritis and an intact rotator cuff. Patients aged 60 years and younger had a higher risk of revision following HA.
Publisher
MJS Publishing, Medical Journals Sweden AB
Reference33 articles.
1. Wagner E R, Farley K X, Higgins I, Wilson J M, Daly C A, Gottschalk M B. The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29(12): 2601-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.049.
2. National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. 19th annual report; 2022. Available from: https://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njr-annual-report-2022/ (accessed Oct 24, 2022).
3. Hochreiter B, Hasler A, Hasler J, Kriechling P, Borbas P, Gerber C. Factors influencing functional internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. JSES Int 2021; 5(4): 679-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.03.005.
4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Joint replacement (primary): hip, knee and shoulder NICE guideline [NG157] 2020; (June). Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng157 (accessed Oct 15, 2022).
5. Craig R S, Goodier H, Singh J A, Hopewell S, Rees J L. Shoulder replacement surgery for osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 4: CD012879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012879.pub2.