Assessment of quality of life of patients with colon cancer depending on the type of perioperative anesthetia

Author:

Tenkach O. O.,Palahonych E. S.

Abstract

The purpose of the study. Assess the quality of life of patients with colon cancer in the perioperative period, depending on the chosen method of anesthesia. Materials and methods. In the period from January to August 2020, an analysis of the results of anesthesia in 32 patients with colon cancer was performed on the basis of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care of KNP «ZPC» ZOR. Two groups of patients were formed in a randomized manner. The difference between the groups was the difference in drug combinations and dosages of anesthesia. Subjective pain assessment studies in patients were performed using a visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaire. The EQ 5D scale (5-point pain scale) was used to assess quality of life. The Hamilton scale was used to assess the patient's psycho-emotional state. Student's mean T test was used to compare pain levels before and after surgery, and p < 0,05 was considered statistically significant. Results. There was a statistically significant difference between cortisol levels after surgery in patients of groups I and II (p = 0,0001). When comparing insulin and blood glucose, it was found that the results of biochemical parameters are lower in group II patients, indicating a lower level of pain or its absence in the first 6 hours after surgery (p = 0,0001). Patients in groups I and II had an increase in the VAS scale, but in patients who used only general anesthesia, the rates were twice as high as in the group of patients who used a combination of epidural anesthesia (p = 0,0001). Evaluating the results of the questionnaire on the EQ 5D scale, a similar picture was established as when evaluating on the VAS scale where in the second group of patients statistically significantly lower pain rates than in the first group (p = 0,0001). The level of anxiety in patients who underwent epidural anesthesia decreased slightly in the postoperative period compared with baseline (p = 0,005). Conclusions. The quality of life of patients in the second group is higher than in patients of group I according to the questionnaire scale EQ 5D (p = 0,0001). The level of anxiety in patients of group I is higher in the first 6 hours after surgery than in patients of group II where epidural anesthesia is used (p = 0,0001).

Publisher

Zaporizhia Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education

Subject

General Medicine

Reference9 articles.

1. Kuchyn JuL, Tokar IA, Bjelka KJu, Artemenko VJu. Predyktory pisljaoperacijnogo bolju vysokoi' intensynvosti (PBVI) u pacijentiv z pere- lomamy proksymal'nogo viddilu stegna. Bil', zne- bolennja ta intensyvna terapija. 2019 (3 (88)): 12–4.

2. Mishhuk VR. Pisljaoperacijnyj bil' u ditej (ogljad literatury). Medycyna neotlozhnыh sostojanyj. 2016 (8): 140–5.

3. Beverly A, Kaye AD, Ljungqvist O, Urman RD. Essential Elements of Multimodal Analgesia in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Guidelines. Anesthesiol Clin. 2017 Jun 1; 35 (2): e115–43.

4. Bos EME, Hollmann MW, Lirk P. Safety and efficacy of epidural analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Dec 1; 30 (6): 736–42.

5. Flaherty MJ. Rehabilitation Therapy in Perioperative Pain Management. Vet Clin North Am – Small Anim Pract. 2019 Nov 1; 49 (6): 1143–56.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3