Analysis of Immunization and Immunization Coverage in Children’s Outpatient Clinics of Any Type (Public or Private): Cross-Sectional Study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Analysis of Immunization and Immunization Coverage in Children’s Outpatient Clinics of Any Type (Public or Private): Cross-Sectional Study

Published:2022-05-13 Issue:2 Volume:21 Page:95-104
ISSN:1682-5535
Container-title:Current Pediatrics
language:
Short-container-title:Vopr. sovr. pediatr.

Author:

Grinchik Polina R.¹^ORCID,Namazova-Baranova Leyla S.²^ORCID,Fedoseenko Marina V.³^ORCID,Vishneva Elena A.³^ORCID,Fominykh Mariya V.⁴^ORCID,Makushina Elena D.⁵,Plenskovskaya Nina Y.⁵,Privalova Tatiana E.³^ORCID,Rtishchev Alexey Yu.⁶^ORCID,Rusinova Dina S.⁷^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

2. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery; Belgorod National Research University

3. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery

4. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery; “Alpha Health Center” Clinic

5. “Alpha Health Center” Clinic

6. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery; Morozov Children’s City Hospital

7. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery; Children’s City Outpatient’s Clinic № 133 of Moscow City Health Department

Abstract

Background. Worldwide private health care system plays significant role in promoting immunization programs for the children population. The role of private medical facilities in Russia in combating children vaccination issues has not been previously studied.Objective. The aim of the study is to study immunization and immunization coverage in children population according to the national immunization schedule (NIS) in outpatient clinics of different forms of property.Methods. The study of medical documentation of children in private (n = 1) and public (n = 2) facilities in Moscow and Moscow region was performed. Immunization (complete vaccination course in those who should be vaccinated by age) and immunization coverage (at least one dose of vaccine by those who have to be vaccinated) were estimated against the NIS schemes according to the data from preventive vaccination cards (form 063/y) and from preventive vaccination lists (form 112/y).Results. The study includes 313 cards of children from private outpatient clinic and 305 — from public outpatient clinic. Immunization and immunization coverage of children against tuberculosis were similar in these facilities: 293 (94%) and 294 (96%) (p = 0.114), respectively, as well as immunization coverage against hepatitis B — in 282 (90%) and 269 (88%) (p = 0.448). Rates of immunization and immunization coverage against the remaining NIS infections were higher in the private clinic. Maximum differences were noted in immunization (178 (57%) in private and 19 (6%) in public facilities; p < 0.001) and immunization coverage (238 (76%) and 52 (17%), respectively; p < 0.001) against pneumococcal disease. Immunization coverage of children for epidemic indications was also higher in private clinic: the largest differences were in immunization against hemophilic and meningococcal infections.Conclusion. Children followed up in private outpatient clinic have higher immunization and immunization coverage rates against most of the NIS infections.

Publisher

Paediatrician Publishers LLC

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference28 articles.

1. Namazova-Baranova LS, Fedoseenko MV, Baranov AA. New Horizons of National Immunization Calendar. Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii — Current Pediatrics. 2019;18(1):13–30. (In Russ). doi: https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v18i1.1988

2. Di Pietrantonj C, Rivetti A, Marchione P, et al. Vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;4(4):CD004407. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1002/14651858.CD004407.pub4

3. Hardt K, Bonanni P, King S, et al. Vaccine strategies: Optimising outcomes. Vaccine. 2016;34(52):6691–6699. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.078

4. Bechini A, Boccalini S, Ninci A, et al. Childhood vaccination coverage in Europe: impact of different public health policies. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2019;18(7):693–701. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14760584.2019.1639502

5. Signorelli C, Odone A, Cella P, Iannazzo S. Childhood vaccine coverage in Italy after the new law on mandatory immunization. Ann Ig. 2018;30(4 Supple 1):1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.7416/ ai.2018.2227

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Dynamics of Timely Vaccination Among Tender-Age Infants in two Subjects of Russian Federation with the Lowest Immunization Coverage in 2020: Serial Cross-Sectional Study;Current Pediatrics;2024-05-05