Affiliation:
1. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Abstract
The main aim of this article is to answer the question whether gender equality actually constitutes one of the “underlying values of the ECHR” through the lens of Article 17 ECHR. Examining this issue requires taking into account the changing paradigm of militant democracy. The hypothesis posed by the author is that, despite the formal declarations of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), gender equality does not alone justify the application of abuse clause. Moreover, this research claims that, due to its adverse impact on the rule of law principle, Article 17 ECHR is not an appropriate remedy to protect gender equality. The research relies on the analysis of the relevant ECtHR’s rulings on Article 17 ECHR.
Reference57 articles.
1. ALDEEB Sami (1996), Musulmans en terre europeenne, "Pratique juridique actuelle", no 1/1996, p. 42-53.
2. ALKIVIADOU Natalie, MANOLI Andrea (2021), The European Court of Human Rights Through the Looking Glass of Gender: An Evaluation, "Goettingen Journal of International Law", vol. 11, no. 1.
3. BANTEKAS Ilias, OETTE Lutz (2020), International Human Rights Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108612524
4. BESSON Samantha (2008), Gender Discrimination under EU and ECHR Law: Never Shall the Twain Meet?, "Human Rights Law Review", vol. 8 (4), p. 647-682. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn023
5. BRETSCHER Fabienne (2019), Protecting the Religious Freedom of New Minorities in International Law: New York https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429264146