SOLVING THE “PROBLEM” OF WILLS FORMALITIES IN THE MODERN POST-PANDEMIC SOCIETY: CAN THE ENDLESS DISCUSSION BE CONCLUDED?

Author:

Załucki Mariusz1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. AFM Kraków University

Abstract

The last will as an instrument of succession law is one of the means of disposing property upon death. Around the world particular legal regulations of American, Australian, European or other countries generally provide for different specific formal requirements for the valid preparation of will. The inappropriateness of this kind of solutions was shown, among others, during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the need for making last wills has increased significantly and has rarely been executed in a manner consistent with the formalities. Reflecting the intent of a testator, often expressed informally, seems to be a more important value of the law of succession than respecting the formalities. This has already been noticed in some countries, especially in common law jurisdictions in Australia and America, where solutions based on substantial compliance doctrine or its variations, contrary to the pan-European strict compliance standard, were adopted. These solutions, however, do not take into consideration plenty of circumstances that may occur in the testation practice and are indifferent to new possible ways of making wills. Meanwhile, the range of mechanisms and proposals for statutory changes in the area of wills formalities is constantly growing. However, there are no proposals to cover all possible legislations in this area, as regards Anglo-American, European or other countries. Yet such a solution seems possible and desirable in order to reconcile the doctrines of substantial compliance and strict compliance. This proposal is the subject of this study.

Publisher

University of Warsaw

Reference97 articles.

1. Baron J. B., Irresolute Testators, Clear and Convincing Wills Law, “Washington & Lee Law Review” 2016, Vol. 73

2. Beckert J., The Longue Durée of Inheritance Law. Discourses and Institutional Development in France, Germany, and the United States since 1800, “European Journal of Sociology” 2007, Vol. 48

3. Beyer G. W., Hargrove C. G., Digital Wills: Has the Time Come for Wills to Join the Digital Revolution?, “Ohio NUL Review” 2007, Vol. 33

4. Binder J., Bürgerliches Recht. Erbrecht, Springer 1923

5. Breitschmid P., Bericht zu den Konturen eines “zeitgemässen Erbrechts” zu Handen des Bundesamtes für Justiz zwecks Umsetzung der “Motion Gutzwiller”, Sonderheft Not@lex/succesio 2014, Nr 7

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3