Effects of 6-Week Motor-Cognitive Agility Training on Football Test Performance in Adult Amateur Players – A Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Friebe David,Banzer Winfried,Giesche Florian,Haser Christian,Hülsdünker Thorben,Pfab Florian,Rußmann Fritz,Sieland Johanna,Spataro Fabio,Vogt Lutz

Abstract

Agility, defined as the ability to rapidly respond to unforeseen events, constitutes a central performance component in football. Existing agility training approaches often focus on change of direction that does not reflect the complex motor-cognitive demands on the pitch. The objective of this study is to examine the effects of a novel motor-cognitive dual-task agility training (Multiple-object tracking integrated into agility training) on agility and football-specific test performance parameters, compared to agility and a change of direction (COD) training. Adult male amateur football players (n = 42; age: 27±6; height: 181±7cm; weight: 80±12kg) were randomly allocated to one of the three intervention groups (COD, agility, agility + multiple object tracking). The Loughborough Soccer Passing Test (LSPT), a dribbling test with/without cognitive task as well as the Random Star Run (with/without ball) and the modified T-Test were assessed before and after a 6-week training period. Time effects within the T-Test (F = 83.9; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.68) and dribbling test without cognitive task (F = 23.9; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.38) with improvements of all intervention groups (p < 0.05) were found. Dribbling with cognitive task revealed a time effect (F = 7.8; p = 0.008; η2 = 0.17), with improvements exclusively in the agility and dual-task agility groups (p < 0.05). Random Star Run with and without ball exhibited a time (F = 38.8; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.5; F = 82.7; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.68) and interaction effect (F = 14.14; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.42; F = 27.8; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.59), with improvements for the agility and dual-task agility groups. LSPT showed no time, group or interaction effect. The effects of change of direction training are limited to change of direction and dribbling test performance within preplanned scenarios. In contrast, motor-cognitive agility interventions result in notable enhancements in football-specific and agility tests, incorporating decision-making and multitasking components. No differences were observed between agility and agility + multiple object tracking. To achieve a transfer to game-relevant performance, coaches should focus on integrating cognitive challenges into motor training.

Publisher

Journal of Sports Science and Medicine

Reference55 articles.

1. Ali A., Williams C., Hulse M., Strudwick A., Reddin J., Howarth L., Eldred J., Hirst M., McGregor S. (2007) Reliability and validity of two tests of soccer skill. Journal of Sports Sciences 25, 1461-1470. Crossref

2. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Askow A.T., Lobato A.L., Arndts D.J., Jennings W., Kreutzer A., Erickson J.L., Esposito P.E., Oliver J.M., Foster C., Jagim A.R. (2021) Session Rating of Perceived Exertion (sRPE) Load and Training Impulse Are Strongly Correlated to GPS-Derived Measures of External Load in NCAA Division I Women's Soccer Athletes. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology 6. Crossref

3. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Bauer C., Graf C., Platschek A.M., Strüder H.K., Ferrari N. (2018) Reasons, Motivational Factors, and Perceived Personal Barriers to Engagement in Physical Activity During Pregnancy Vary Within the BMI Classes: The Prenatal Prevention Project Germany. Journal of Physical Activity & Health 15, 204-211. Crossref

4. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Büchel D., Gokeler A., Heuvelmans P., Baumeister J. (2022) Increased Cognitive Demands Affect Agility Performance in Female Athletes - Implications for Testing and Training of Agility in Team Ball Sports. Perceptual and Motor Skills 129, 1074-1088. Crossref

5. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Bekris E., Gissis I., Kounalakis S. (2018) The dribbling agility test as a potential tool for evaluating the dribbling skill in young soccer players. Research in Sports Medicine (Print) 26, 425-435. Crossref

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3