Author:
Tai Mu-Lin,Yang Chun-Ju,Tang Wen-Tzu,Elliott Bruce,Chang Kai-Lung
Abstract
Drive volley is one of the essential backhand stroke technique trends seen in recent women’s tennis competitions. Although movements of the drive volley and groundstroke are similar, activation of the internal muscles vary due to different incoming ball conditions. Most previous studies only focused on the groundstroke, however. The current study investigates the different muscle activation patterns in the upper extremity muscle during the two-handed backhand drive volley as well as the groundstroke for female tennis players. Ten elite female tennis players were measured in the muscle activation of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR), extensor carpi radialis (ECR), biceps brachii (BB), and triceps brachii (TB) from both upper extremities. Racket-head speed at impact, swing duration of each phase, and racket-head average velocity in both strokes were also recorded. Significant differences were found between the drive volley and groundstroke in the velocity profile of racket tip, swing duration of each phase (preparation, early follow-through, and late follow-through), activation patterns of upper extremity muscles, and flexor/ extensor ratios of wrist and elbow in both upper extremities. Different racket trajectory strategies were also observed between the two strokes, with greater horizontal racket velocity recorded in the groundstroke but greater vertical velocity in the drive volley. ECR and TB muscle activation during the drive volley preparation phase was greater than the groundstroke when completing a quicker backswing. In the early acceleration phase, the greater FCR leading arm activation in the drive volley assisted wrist stabilization in preparation for impact. In the late follow-through phase, less TB leading arm activity and higher ECR trailing arm activity in the drive volley showed more forward compression movement in racket contact with the ball. As it is essential for the drive volley to complete a quicker backswing and to increase shot efficiency at the end of the forward movement, coaches should consider the two strokes’ muscle activation and technique differences to enhance specific techniques and fitness training programs.
Publisher
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Subject
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference37 articles.
1. Aleksovski A. (2013) Forehand backswing-from theory to practice. Activities in Physical Education & Sport 3, 229-231.
2. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Alizadehkhaiyat O., Fisher A. C., Kemp G. J., Vishwanathan K., Frostick S. P. (2007) Upper limb muscle imbalance in tennis elbow: A functional and electromyographic assessment. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 25, 1651-1657. Crossref
3. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Andrew D. P., Chow J. W., Knudson D. V., Tillman M. D. (2003) Effect of ball size on player reaction and racket acceleration during the tennis volley. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 6, 102-112. Crossref
4. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Antoun, R.(2007) Women's tennis tactics. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 133-134.
5. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Blackwell J. R., Cole K. J. (1994) Wrist kinematics differ in expert and novice tennis players performing the backhand stroke: Implications for tennis elbow. Journal of Biomechanics 27, 509-516. Crossref
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献