Abstract
Pancasila and UUD 1945 form the foundation of Indonesia's social unity. This article analyzes whether Pancasila and UUD 1945 align with John Rawls' criteria of overlapping consensus. The article concludes that the agreement among Indonesia's founding fathers fulfills the requirements of an "overlapping consensus." This consensus encompasses principles of justice that remain independent of any comprehensive doctrine, ensuring the protection of citizens' fundamental rights and the most disadvantaged groups. Despite its imperfections, this consensus significantly contributes to Indonesian social unity. Nevertheless, the reality is marked by challenges and threats that require resolution. Some groups seek to dominate others, and specific rules deviate from the principles of justice. The state and society's commitment to uphold the overlapping consensus is crucial. Among the institutions entrusted with maintaining this consensus is the Constitutional Court.
Publisher
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Reference76 articles.
1. Abdullah, Najwa, and Mohamed Nawab Mohamed Osman. “Islamisation in the Indonesian Media Spaces New Sites for a Conservative Push.” Journal of Religious and Political Practice 4, no. 3 (September 2, 2018): 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/20566093.2018.1525894.
2. Alfitri. “Religious Liberty in Indonesia and the Rights of ‘Deviant’ Sects.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 3 (2008): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2194607800000144.
3. Anshari, Endang Saifuddin. Piagam Jakarta 22 Juni 1945: Sebuah Konsensus Nasional Tentang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia (1945-1949). Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1997.
4. Aspinall, Edward. “Health Care and Democratization in Indonesia.” Democratization 21, no. 5 (February 26, 2014): 803–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.873791.
5. Assyaukanie, Luthfi. Ideologi Islam Dan Utopia: Tiga Model Negara Demokrasi Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Freedom Institute, 2011.