Abstract
Observing the follow-up of state law-forming institutions (House of Representative and President) after the Constitutional Court Decision is a wise step for the development of legal knowledge. This study uses a normative juridical approach. The results of the study: (i) legal order (injunction) in the ruling section, while legal order (advice) contained in legal considerations and, (ii) follow-up to legal order (injunction) contained in the Constitutional Court's rulings that have been implemented. and some have not been implemented because it has not reached the specified time limit. Meanwhile, the legal order (advice) of the related Constitutional Court decision has been implemented. In the end, it can be concluded that in a decision of the Constitutional Court there are two categories of legal order, namely injunction and advice, which have been implemented by the legislators. Although some have not been implemented because it has not reached the specified time limit.
Publisher
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Reference45 articles.
1. Agustun, Yusti Nurul & Ana, Nur Rosihin. “Pemanggilan Notaris Tak Perlu Persetujuan Majelis Pengawas Daerah.” Majalah Konstitusi, Nomor 76 (Juni 2013), 41.
2. Ali, “MK Gelar Sidang Pengujian Surat Edaran,” https://m.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mk-gelar-sidang-pengujian-surat-edaran-lt4bcf222c1ac11, diakses pada 28 Februari 2022.
3. Ali, Mohammad Mahrus., Hilipito, Meyrinda Rahmawaty & Asy’ari, Syukri. “Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Konstitusional Bersyarat Serta Memuat Norma Baru.” Jurnal Konstitusi Volume 12, Nomor 3, (2015): 631-662.
4. Ana, Nur Rosihin. “Elegi Pernikahan Dini.” Majalah Konstitusi, Nomor 143 (Januari 2019), 18-19.
5. Anggono, Bayu Dwi. “Omnibus Law sebagai Teknik Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Peluang Adopsi dan Tantangannya dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia.“ Jurnal Rechtsvinding Volume 9, Nomor 1, (2020): 16-37.